Court hearing arguments on NFL concussions
April 9, 2013
New Sportsbook.ag customers: Make your 1st bet, get your 2nd bet free, 100%, winnings paid in cash.
Already have an account? Click here to view new Exclusive Rewards!
PHILADELPHIA (AP) - Former NFL players trying to sue the league over concussion-linked injuries have argued in court that the NFL ``glorified'' violence and profited from damaging hits to the head.
Players' lawyer David Frederick also called the NFL's brain-injury committee ``a sham'' that spread misinformation.
Frederick's remarks came in a pivotal hearing Tuesday in Philadelphia on lawsuits filed by about 4,200 former players and their families.
Some players are suffering from dementia or depression, and fault the league for rushing them back on the field.
NFL lawyer Paul Clement says the teams bear primary responsibility for health and safety under the players' contract. And he says injury claims belong in arbitration under the collective bargaining agreement.
U.S. District Judge Anita Brody appears most interested in whether the contract gives anyone specific responsibility for latent brain injuries.
The Associated Press News Service
The Associated Press
All Rights Reserved
9-3 L12 Picks, 73 % +1,083 TY
3-0 L3 G-Plays, 6-1 L7 Picks
With a VI Gold Membership, you can SAVE 10%
off a Live Odds subscription, SAVE 20%
off Daily Pick packages, and receive access to up to 1,000
Member Plays each month!