Sign Up Subscribe
Featured Last Updated Oct 28 2025, 12:36 PM

College Football Week 10 Best Bets: Tuesday Night Bet For UTEP vs. Kennesaw

Dylan Wilkerson
Dylan Wilkerson Sports Betting Expert
College Football Week 10 Best Bets: Tuesday Night Bet For UTEP vs. Kennesaw

Image Credit: Michael Caterina-Imagn Images

Week 10 of college football is here and I have 16 best bets for you.

Be sure to check out my NFL week 9 best bets as well.

I will be updating this article as more bets get placed, so be sure to check back regularly and add us as a featured source to get the latest sports odds, news, and picks!

Google Preferred Source

First things first: to make the most of college football saturday, you want to make sure you are getting the best line and taking advantage of the best sportsbook promos. Our college football odds page has odds for every game and every major sportsbook. We also have plenty of offers for users to take advantage of, below.

UTEP VS. KENNESAW STATE BEST BET

UTEP @ KENN Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
+10 -110 +6 -110 + +5.5 even + +6.5 -115 + +6.5 -113 + +6.5 -115 + +6.5 -100 + +6.5 -105 + +6.5 -110 +6.5 +106 + +10.5 -115  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
-10 -110 -6 -110 + -5.5 -120 + -6.5 -105 + -6.5 -109 + -6.5 -115 + -6.5 -122 + -6.5 -120 + -6.5 -110 -6.5 -130 + -10.5 -105  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
o48.5 -110 o24.5 -125 + N/A o26.5 -108 + o26.5 -102 + N/A o26.5 -114 + o26.5 -115 + o26.5 -110 o26.5 -112 + o51.5 -110  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
u48.5 -110 u24.5 +105 + N/A u26.5 -112 + u26.5 -122 + N/A u26.5 -106 + u26.5 -110 + u26.5 -110 u26.5 -117 + u51.5 -110  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
+250 +250 + +220 + +250 + +235 + +220 + +250 + N/A N/A +230 + +300  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
-310 -310 + -275 + -310 + -320 + -310 + -325 + N/A N/A -315 + -375  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
+10 -110 +3.5 -120 + +3.5 -118 + +3.5 -120 + N/A +3.5 -125 + +3.5 -124 + +3.5 -130 + +3.5 -125 +3.5 -112 + +10.5 -115  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
-10 -110 -3.5 -110 + -3.5 -110 + -3.5 -110 + N/A -3.5 -105 + -3.5 -100 + -3.5 even + -3.5 -105 -3.5 -115 + -10.5 -105  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
o48.5 -110 o10.5 -110 + N/A o10.5 -110 + N/A o10.5 -110 + o10.5 +104 + o10.5 -105 + o10.5 -105 o11.5 -115 + o51.5 -110  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
u48.5 -110 u10.5 -120 + N/A u10.5 -120 + N/A u10.5 -120 + u10.5 -130 + u10.5 -125 + u10.5 -125 u11.5 -113 + u51.5 -110  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
+250 +190 + +190 + +190 + +195 + +210 + +210 + N/A N/A +200 + +300  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
-310 -240 + -250 + -250 + -230 + -300 + -280 + N/A N/A -275 + -375  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
+10 -110 N/A N/A +5.5 -110 + +4.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +10.5 -115  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
-10 -110 N/A N/A -5.5 -110 + -4.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -10.5 -105  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
o48.5 -110 N/A N/A o24.5 -112 + o23.5 -125 + N/A N/A o26.5 -110 + N/A N/A o51.5 -110  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
u48.5 -110 N/A N/A u24.5 -108 + u23.5 +105 + N/A N/A u26.5 -115 + N/A N/A u51.5 -110  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
+250 N/A N/A +215 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +300  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
-310 N/A N/A -265 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -375  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
+10 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -110 + N/A N/A +3.5 -114 + +3.5 -130 + N/A N/A +10.5 -115  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
-10 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -120 + N/A N/A -3.5 -118 + -3.5 even + N/A N/A -10.5 -105  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
o48.5 -110 o14.5 even + N/A o14.5 +105 + N/A N/A o14.5 -100 + o14.5 +105 + N/A N/A o51.5 -110  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
u48.5 -110 u14.5 -120 + N/A u14.5 -135 + N/A N/A u14.5 -124 + u14.5 -135 + N/A N/A u51.5 -110  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
+250 +170 + N/A +150 + N/A N/A +200 + N/A N/A N/A +300  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
-310 -205 + N/A -195 + N/A N/A -265 + N/A N/A N/A -375  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
+10 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 even + N/A N/A +2.5 -106 + +2.5 +105 + N/A N/A +10.5 -115  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
-10 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -130 + N/A N/A -2.5 -125 + -2.5 -130 + N/A N/A -10.5 -105  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
o48.5 -110 o10 -110 + N/A o10.5 -110 + N/A N/A o10.5 -110 + o10.5 -105 + N/A N/A o51.5 -110  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
u48.5 -110 u10 -110 + N/A u10.5 -120 + N/A N/A u10.5 -114 + u10.5 -120 + N/A N/A u51.5 -110  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
+250 +210 + N/A +175 + N/A N/A +180 + N/A N/A N/A +300  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
-310 -260 + N/A -230 + N/A N/A -235 + N/A N/A N/A -375  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
+10 -110 +0.5 -110 + N/A +2.5 -110 + N/A N/A +1.5 -114 + +0.5 -110 + N/A N/A +10.5 -115  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
-10 -110 -0.5 -110 + N/A -2.5 -120 + N/A N/A -1.5 -114 + -0.5 -115 + N/A N/A -10.5 -105  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
o48.5 -110 o13.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 -125 + N/A N/A o13.5 -118 + o13.5 -150 + N/A N/A o51.5 -110  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
u48.5 -110 u13.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -105 + N/A N/A u13.5 -106 + u13.5 +120 + N/A N/A u51.5 -110  
UTEP Miners 301 UTEP
+250 +160 + N/A +160 + N/A N/A +154 + N/A N/A N/A +300  
Kennesaw State Owls 302 Kennesaw State
-310 -190 + N/A -210 + N/A N/A -200 + N/A N/A N/A -375  

UTEP's offense is one of the worst in college football. They rank 134th in offensive success rate, 131st in passing offense, and 120th in rushing offense. However, UTEP is rather strong on defense. They rank 16th in defensive success rate allowed and are particularly effective against the run.

Kennesaw is another team that has it's offensive woes. Both teams play slow, averaging 67 offensive snaps per game. I expect this to be a low-scoring matchup.

Bet: UTEP Miners @ Kennesaw State Owls u51 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT bet365!

VANDERBILT VS. TEXAS BEST BET

VAN @ TEX Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
+3.5 -110 +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -118 + +0.5 -110 + +0.5 -115 + N/A +1.5 -112 + +0.5 -125 + +0.5 -120 N/A +2.5 -112  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
-3.5 -110 -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -102 + -0.5 -110 + -0.5 -105 + N/A -1.5 -108 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 even N/A -2.5 -108  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
o44.5 -120 o22 -105 + N/A o22.5 -112 + o22 -105 + N/A o23.5 +108 + o21.5 -115 + o21.5 -110 N/A o44.5 -118  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
u44.5 even u22 -115 + N/A u22.5 -108 + u22 -115 + N/A u23.5 -130 + u21.5 -115 + u21.5 -110 N/A u44.5 -102  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
+114 even + even + +102 + even + N/A +116 + N/A N/A N/A +110  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
-135 -120 + -120 + -122 + -120 + N/A -142 + N/A N/A N/A -130  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
+3.5 -110 +0.5 -145 + +0.5 -150 + +0.5 -154 + +0.5 -145 + N/A +1.5 -152 + +0.5 -155 + -0.5 +150 N/A +2.5 -112  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
-3.5 -110 -0.5 +115 + -0.5 +118 + -0.5 +120 + -0.5 +115 + N/A -1.5 +122 + -0.5 +120 + +0.5 -210 N/A -2.5 -108  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
o44.5 -120 o9.5 -125 + N/A o9.5 -125 + o9.5 -130 + N/A o9.5 -120 + o9.5 -115 + o10.5 +140 N/A o44.5 -118  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
u44.5 even u9.5 -105 + N/A u9.5 -105 + u9.5 even + N/A u9.5 -104 + u9.5 -110 + u10.5 -195 N/A u44.5 -102  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
+114 even + +105 + even + even + N/A +112 + N/A N/A N/A +110  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
-135 -130 + -135 + -130 + -130 + N/A -142 + N/A N/A N/A -130  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
+3.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -142 + +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -112  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
-3.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +120 + -0.5 +105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -108  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
o44.5 -120 N/A N/A o22.5 -108 + o21.5 -105 + N/A N/A o21.5 -110 + N/A N/A o44.5 -118  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
u44.5 even N/A N/A u22.5 -112 + u21.5 -115 + N/A N/A u21.5 -120 + N/A N/A u44.5 -102  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
+114 N/A N/A -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +110  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
-135 N/A N/A -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -130  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
+3.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -146 + N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -112  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
-3.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +110 + N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -108  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
o44.5 -120 o12 -110 + N/A o10.5 -115 + N/A N/A o13.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A o44.5 -118  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
u44.5 even u12 -110 + N/A u10.5 -115 + N/A N/A u13.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A u44.5 -102  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
+114 -110 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A +104 + N/A N/A N/A +110  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
-135 -110 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -132 + N/A N/A N/A -130  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
+3.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -166 + N/A N/A +1.5 -180 + N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -112  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
-3.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +130 + N/A N/A -1.5 +134 + N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -108  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
o44.5 -120 o10 -110 + N/A o9.5 -115 + N/A N/A o9.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A o44.5 -118  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
u44.5 even u10 -110 + N/A u9.5 -115 + N/A N/A u9.5 +104 + N/A N/A N/A u44.5 -102  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
+114 -110 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A -104 + N/A N/A N/A +110  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
-135 -110 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -122 + N/A N/A N/A -130  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
+3.5 -110 +0.5 -170 + N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A +1.5 -174 + N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -112  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
-3.5 -110 -0.5 +145 + N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A -1.5 +130 + N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -108  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
o44.5 -120 o10.5 -105 + N/A o12.5 -125 + N/A N/A o10.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A o44.5 -118  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
u44.5 even u10.5 -115 + N/A u12.5 -105 + N/A N/A u10.5 -116 + N/A N/A N/A u44.5 -102  
Vanderbilt Commodores 349 Vanderbilt
+114 -110 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -104 + N/A N/A N/A +110  
Texas Longhorns 350 Texas
-135 -110 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A -122 + N/A N/A N/A -130  

These teams have both played equal schedules according to PFF, and surprisingly enough, these teams' advanced stats are similar as well. Texas' defense has been the strength of this unit all season, but Vanderbilt's offense ranks 13th in EPA/pass and 4th in EPA/rush. This Vanderbilt offense is very much equipped to give this Texas defense a test.

I don't trust this Texas offense to get anything going against Vanderbilt, even given the fact that the Commodores have the 112th pass defense. Texas struggles on early downs, posting a negative EPA/play and are 100th in offensive EPA/drive. Vanderbilt comes out on top in this SEC matchup.

Check out our complete Vanderbilt vs. Texas prediction and preview.

Bet: Vanderbilt Commodores Moneyline (+105)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT CAESARS!

OKLAHOMA VS. TENNESSEE BEST BET

OU @ TENN Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
+2.5 -110 +2.5 -115 + +1.5 -110 + +1.5 -112 + +1.5 -110 + +1.5 -110 + +1.5 -110 + +1.5 -115 + +1.5 -110 +1.5 -107 + +3 -112  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
-2.5 -110 -2.5 -105 + -1.5 -110 + -1.5 -108 + -1.5 -110 + -1.5 -120 + -1.5 -110 + -1.5 -115 + -1.5 -110 -1.5 -117 + -3 -108  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
o56.5 -110 o27 -125 + N/A o27.5 -108 + o27 -125 + N/A o28.5 -102 + o27.5 -115 + o27.5 -105 o27.5 -115 + o56.5 -112  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
u56.5 -110 u27 +105 + N/A u27.5 -112 + u27 +105 + N/A u28.5 -120 + u27.5 -115 + u27.5 -115 u27.5 -113 + u56.5 -108  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
+130 +115 + +115 + +114 + +115 + +110 + +120 + N/A N/A +110 + +130  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
-155 -135 + -140 + -135 + -135 + -140 + -150 + N/A N/A -143 + -155  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -130 + +0.5 -120 + +0.5 -130 + N/A N/A +1.5 -140 + +0.5 -135 + -0.5 +165 +1.5 -143 + +3 -112  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
-2.5 -110 -0.5 even + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 even + N/A N/A -1.5 +112 + -0.5 +105 + +0.5 -235 -1.5 +110 + -3 -108  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
o56.5 -110 o12.5 -125 + N/A o13.5 -110 + N/A N/A o12.5 -120 + o10.5 -120 + o10.5 -125 o12.5 -120 + o56.5 -112  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
u56.5 -110 u12.5 -105 + N/A u13.5 -120 + N/A N/A u12.5 -104 + u10.5 -105 + u10.5 -105 u12.5 -108 + u56.5 -108  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
+130 +110 + +115 + +114 + +110 + N/A +118 + N/A N/A +108 + +130  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
-155 -140 + -150 + -145 + -140 + N/A -148 + N/A N/A -141 + -155  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -135 + +0.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +3 -112  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +114 + -0.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -3 -108  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
o56.5 -110 N/A N/A o28.5 -102 + o28.5 even + N/A N/A o28.5 -110 + N/A N/A o56.5 -112  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
u56.5 -110 N/A N/A u28.5 -118 + u28.5 -120 + N/A N/A u28.5 -120 + N/A N/A u56.5 -108  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
+130 N/A N/A -102 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +130  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
-155 N/A N/A -118 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -155  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -140 N/A N/A +1.5 -138 + N/A N/A N/A +3 -112  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +110 N/A N/A -1.5 +104 + N/A N/A N/A -3 -108  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
o56.5 -110 o15.5 -110 + N/A o14.5 -110 N/A N/A o16.5 -122 + N/A N/A N/A o56.5 -112  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
u56.5 -110 u15.5 -110 + N/A u14.5 -120 N/A N/A u16.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A u56.5 -108  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
+130 +105 + N/A -110 N/A N/A +106 + N/A N/A N/A +130  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
-155 -125 + N/A -120 N/A N/A -138 + N/A N/A N/A -155  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -130 N/A N/A +1.5 -180 + N/A N/A N/A +3 -112  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 even N/A N/A -1.5 +128 + N/A N/A N/A -3 -108  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
o56.5 -110 o13.5 -120 + N/A o13.5 -130 N/A N/A o13.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A o56.5 -112  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
u56.5 -110 u13.5 even + N/A u13.5 even N/A N/A u13.5 -116 + N/A N/A N/A u56.5 -108  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
+130 even + N/A +114 N/A N/A -104 + N/A N/A N/A +130  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
-155 -120 + N/A -145 N/A N/A -122 + N/A N/A N/A -155  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -150 + N/A +0.5 -135 N/A N/A +1.5 -166 + N/A N/A N/A +3 -112  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
-2.5 -110 -0.5 +125 + N/A -0.5 +105 N/A N/A -1.5 +122 + N/A N/A N/A -3 -108  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
o56.5 -110 o16 -110 + N/A o14.5 -120 N/A N/A o13.5 -138 + N/A N/A N/A o56.5 -112  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
u56.5 -110 u16 -110 + N/A u14.5 -110 N/A N/A u13.5 +110 + N/A N/A N/A u56.5 -108  
Oklahoma Sooners 325 Oklahoma
+130 even + N/A -105 N/A N/A -102 + N/A N/A N/A +130  
Tennessee Volunteers 326 Tennessee
-155 -120 + N/A -125 N/A N/A -125 + N/A N/A N/A -155  

I am fascinated to see this Oklahoma defense face off against this explosive Tennessee offense. These matchups are truly a tale of two different skill sets. What Oklahoma has in defense they lack in offense, and it is vice versa for Tennessee. Oklahoma can make a serious case that they are one of the best defenses in the country, and Tennessee is a top-15 offense.

Last week against Ole Miss, John Mateer threw for the most yards since his surgery, indicating some positive momentum in his performance. This Tennessee defense is a great unit to get back on track against. Oklahoma keeps this game close.

Check out our complete Tennessee vs. Oklahoma prediction and preview.

Bet: Oklahoma Sooners +3.5 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT FANDUEL!

UCF VS. BAYLOR BEST BET

UCF @ BAY Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
UCF Knights 359 UCF
+4.5 -110 +2.5 even + +3 -115 + +2.5 even + +2.5 even + +2.5 -105 + +2.5 -102 + +2.5 -105 + +2.5 even N/A +4.5 -112  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
-4.5 -110 -2.5 -120 + -3 -105 + -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -125 + -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -130 + -2.5 -120 N/A -4.5 -108  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
o58.5 -118 o29.5 -110 + N/A o28.5 -108 + o28.5 -110 + N/A o30.5 -108 + o28.5 -115 + o28.5 -110 N/A o59.5 -115  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
u58.5 -102 u29.5 -110 + N/A u28.5 -112 + u28.5 -110 + N/A u30.5 -112 + u28.5 -115 + u28.5 -110 N/A u59.5 -105  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
+142 +140 + +145 + +136 + +140 + +130 + +134 + N/A N/A N/A +164  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
-170 -165 + -175 + -162 + -165 + -170 + -164 + N/A N/A N/A -198  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
+4.5 -110 +0.5 -105 + +0.5 -105 + +2.5 -130 + +0.5 even + N/A +1.5 -128 + +0.5 -120 + +0.5 -115 N/A +4.5 -112  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
-4.5 -110 -0.5 -125 + -0.5 -120 + -2.5 even + -0.5 -130 + N/A -1.5 +102 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -115 N/A -4.5 -108  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
o58.5 -118 o13.5 -110 + N/A o12.5 -120 + o12.5 -125 + N/A o13.5 -114 + o13.5 -110 + o13.5 -110 N/A o59.5 -115  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
u58.5 -102 u13.5 -120 + N/A u12.5 -110 + u12.5 -105 + N/A u13.5 -110 + u13.5 -115 + u13.5 -120 N/A u59.5 -105  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
+142 +135 + +140 + +135 + +140 + N/A +128 + N/A N/A N/A +164  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
-170 -165 + -185 + -175 + -170 + N/A -164 + N/A N/A N/A -198  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
+4.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -110 + +1.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +4.5 -112  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
-4.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -110 + -1.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -4.5 -108  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
o58.5 -118 N/A N/A o30.5 -110 + o30.5 -110 + N/A N/A o30.5 -125 + N/A N/A o59.5 -115  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
u58.5 -102 N/A N/A u30.5 -110 + u30.5 -110 + N/A N/A u30.5 -110 + N/A N/A u59.5 -105  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
+142 N/A N/A +140 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +164  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
-170 N/A N/A -166 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -198  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
+4.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A +1.5 -136 + N/A N/A N/A +4.5 -112  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
-4.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A -1.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A -4.5 -108  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
o58.5 -118 o16 -110 + N/A o16.5 -135 + N/A N/A o17.5 +114 + N/A N/A N/A o59.5 -115  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
u58.5 -102 u16 -110 + N/A u16.5 +105 + N/A N/A u17.5 -142 + N/A N/A N/A u59.5 -105  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
+142 +115 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A +114 + N/A N/A N/A +164  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
-170 -135 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A -146 + N/A N/A N/A -198  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
+4.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A +1.5 -158 + N/A N/A N/A +4.5 -112  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
-4.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A -1.5 +118 + N/A N/A N/A -4.5 -108  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
o58.5 -118 o14 -105 + N/A o13.5 -154 + N/A N/A o13.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A o59.5 -115  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
u58.5 -102 u14 -115 + N/A u13.5 +120 + N/A N/A u13.5 +104 + N/A N/A N/A u59.5 -105  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
+142 +125 + N/A +124 + N/A N/A +112 + N/A N/A N/A +164  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
-170 -150 + N/A -160 + N/A N/A -142 + N/A N/A N/A -198  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
+4.5 -110 +0.5 -125 + N/A +0.5 -120 + N/A N/A +1.5 -172 + N/A N/A N/A +4.5 -112  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
-4.5 -110 -0.5 +105 + N/A -0.5 -110 + N/A N/A -1.5 +128 + N/A N/A N/A -4.5 -108  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
o58.5 -118 o17 -115 + N/A o16.5 -110 + N/A N/A o14.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A o59.5 -115  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
u58.5 -102 u17 -105 + N/A u16.5 -120 + N/A N/A u14.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A u59.5 -105  
UCF Knights 359 UCF
+142 +115 + N/A +114 + N/A N/A -102 + N/A N/A N/A +164  
Baylor Bears 360 Baylor
-170 -135 + N/A -145 + N/A N/A -125 + N/A N/A N/A -198  

If the Baylor Bears can do anything, they can score points. Baylor is efficient on early downs, and they don't find themselves behind the sticks very often.

UCF has the 100th-ranked strength of schedule to date according to PFF, where Baylor has the 24th toughest. Although UCF may have the slight edge over Baylor on paper, adding the context of each team's respective schedule changes the picture of this matchup. Baylor's explosive offense should allow them to beat UCF handily.

Bet: Baylor Bears -4.5 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT bet365!

WEST VIRGINIA VS. HOUSTON BEST BET

WVU @ HOU Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
+15.5 -110 +7.5 -120 + +7.5 -120 + +7.5 -122 + +7.5 -120 + +7.5 -125 + +7.5 -122 + +7.5 -125 + +7.5 -135 N/A +13.5 -112  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
-15.5 -110 -7.5 even + -7.5 even + -7.5 +102 + -7.5 -104 + -7.5 -105 + -7.5 -100 + -7.5 -105 + -7.5 +110 N/A -13.5 -108  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
o49.5 -115 o25.5 even + N/A o24.5 -102 + o24.5 -114 + N/A o24.5 -108 + o24.5 -110 + o24.5 -105 N/A o49.5 -108  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
u49.5 -105 u25.5 -120 + N/A u24.5 -118 + u24.5 -108 + N/A u24.5 -112 + u24.5 -120 + u24.5 -115 N/A u49.5 -112  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
+455 +325 + +310 + +310 + +305 + +260 + +300 + N/A N/A N/A +425  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
-625 -425 + -400 + -425 + -420 + -420 + -400 + N/A N/A N/A -575  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
+15.5 -110 +5.5 -120 + +4.5 -120 + +4.5 -120 + +4.5 -115 + N/A +3.5 -114 + +3.5 -115 + +4.5 -125 N/A +13.5 -112  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
-15.5 -110 -5.5 -110 + -4.5 -110 + -4.5 -110 + -4.5 -115 + N/A -3.5 -110 + -3.5 -115 + -4.5 -105 N/A -13.5 -108  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
o49.5 -115 o10 -125 + N/A o10.5 even + o10 -130 + N/A o9.5 -150 + o10.5 +105 + o10.5 +110 N/A o49.5 -108  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
u49.5 -105 u10 -105 + N/A u10.5 -130 + u10 even + N/A u9.5 +120 + u10.5 -135 + u10.5 -150 N/A u49.5 -112  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
+455 +230 + +240 + +240 + +240 + N/A +235 + N/A N/A N/A +425  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
-625 -310 + -325 + -330 + -300 + N/A -320 + N/A N/A N/A -575  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
+15.5 -110 N/A N/A +6.5 -115 + +6.5 even + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +13.5 -112  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
-15.5 -110 N/A N/A -6.5 -105 + -6.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -13.5 -108  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
o49.5 -115 N/A N/A o23.5 -112 + o23.5 -115 + N/A N/A o23.5 -120 + N/A N/A o49.5 -108  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
u49.5 -105 N/A N/A u23.5 -108 + u23.5 -105 + N/A N/A u23.5 -110 + N/A N/A u49.5 -112  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
+455 N/A N/A +240 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +425  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
-625 N/A N/A -298 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -575  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
+15.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 even + N/A N/A +3.5 -100 + N/A N/A N/A +13.5 -112  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
-15.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -130 + N/A N/A -3.5 -132 + N/A N/A N/A -13.5 -108  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
o49.5 -115 o14 -105 + N/A o13.5 -130 + N/A N/A o14.5 +108 + N/A N/A N/A o49.5 -108  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
u49.5 -105 u14 -115 + N/A u13.5 even + N/A N/A u14.5 -135 + N/A N/A N/A u49.5 -112  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
+455 +250 + N/A +165 + N/A N/A +230 + N/A N/A N/A +425  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
-625 -310 + N/A -215 + N/A N/A -310 + N/A N/A N/A -575  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
+15.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -125 + N/A N/A +3.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A +13.5 -112  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
-15.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 -105 + N/A N/A -3.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A -13.5 -108  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
o49.5 -115 o10 -110 + N/A o10.5 +105 + N/A N/A o10.5 +108 + N/A N/A N/A o49.5 -108  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
u49.5 -105 u10 -110 + N/A u10.5 -135 + N/A N/A u10.5 -135 + N/A N/A N/A u49.5 -112  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
+455 +210 + N/A +200 + N/A N/A +210 + N/A N/A N/A +425  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
-625 -260 + N/A -270 + N/A N/A -280 + N/A N/A N/A -575  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
+15.5 -110 +1 -110 + N/A +2.5 -115 + N/A N/A +2.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A +13.5 -112  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
-15.5 -110 -1 -110 + N/A -2.5 -115 + N/A N/A -2.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A -13.5 -108  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
o49.5 -115 o13 -110 + N/A o13.5 -110 + N/A N/A o13.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A o49.5 -108  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
u49.5 -105 u13 -110 + N/A u13.5 -120 + N/A N/A u13.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A u49.5 -112  
West Virginia Mountaineers 381 West Virginia
+455 +165 + N/A +160 + N/A N/A +172 + N/A N/A N/A +425  
Houston Cougars 382 Houston
-625 -200 + N/A -210 + N/A N/A -225 + N/A N/A N/A -575  

The matchup I am eyeing here is Houston's defense vs. West Virginia's offense. West Virginia has one of the worst passing offenses in college football, ranking 129th in passing offense. Their offensive success rate comes in at 127th, and their offensive passing success rate is 125th. Houston's defense is strong and well rounded. They rank 37th against the pass and 29th against the rush.

Houston's offense is not particularly strong, so I expect both offenses to struggle in this matchup and the game to be a low-scoring affair.

Bet: West Virginia Mountaineers @ Houston Cougars u49.5 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT FANDUEL!

DUKE VS. CLEMSON BEST BET

It is possible that Duke is the unluckiest team in college football. You can go back and look at their losses and make a serious case that they should have won each of those games. They rank 18th in offensive success rate, 13th in early-downs EPA/play, and 7th in passing success rate.

Clemson has been unable to run the ball and comes in with the 131st-ranked rush offense in college football. The Duke defense will not be asked to do too much, and the Duke offense is going to be able to move the ball up and down the field against Clemson.

Bet: Duke Blue Devils +3.5 (-108)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT DRAFTKINGS!

ARMY VS. AIR FORCE BEST BET

ARMY @ AFA Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Army Black Knights 347 Army
-1.5 -110 +0.5 -120 + +0.5 -120 + +0.5 -122 + -0.5 even + +0.5 -130 + +1.5 -134 + +0.5 -135 + +1.5 -140 N/A +1.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
+1.5 -110 -0.5 even + -0.5 even + -0.5 +102 + +0.5 -120 + -0.5 even + -1.5 +110 + -0.5 even + -1.5 +115 N/A -1.5 -108  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
o49.5 -110 o23.5 even + N/A o23.5 -108 + o23.5 -105 + N/A o23.5 +110 + o23.5 -110 + o23.5 -105 N/A o48.5 -110  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
u49.5 -110 u23.5 -120 + N/A u23.5 -112 + u23.5 -115 + N/A u23.5 -110 + u23.5 -120 + u23.5 -115 N/A u48.5 -110  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
-130 -105 + -105 + -108 + -105 + -110 + -105 + N/A N/A N/A -105  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
+110 -115 + -115 + -112 + -115 + -120 + -118 + N/A N/A N/A -115  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
-1.5 -110 -0.5 +120 + +0.5 -180 + +0.5 -175 + -0.5 +130 + N/A +1.5 -180 + +0.5 -160 + -0.5 +145 N/A +1.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
+1.5 -110 +0.5 -150 + -0.5 +135 + -0.5 +135 + +0.5 -160 + N/A -1.5 +144 + -0.5 +125 + +0.5 -205 N/A -1.5 -108  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
o49.5 -110 o10 -125 + N/A o10.5 even + o9.5 -130 + N/A o9.5 -138 + o9.5 -125 + o10.5 +115 N/A o48.5 -110  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
u49.5 -110 u10 -105 + N/A u10.5 -130 + u9.5 even + N/A u9.5 +110 + u9.5 -105 + u10.5 -155 N/A u48.5 -110  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
-130 -115 + -105 + -105 + -115 + N/A -104 + N/A N/A N/A -105  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
+110 -115 + -125 + -125 + -115 + N/A -122 + N/A N/A N/A -115  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -142 + +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +120 + -0.5 +105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -108  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
o49.5 -110 N/A N/A o24.5 -108 + o24.5 +105 + N/A N/A o24.5 -105 + N/A N/A o48.5 -110  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
u49.5 -110 N/A N/A u24.5 -112 + u24.5 -125 + N/A N/A u24.5 -130 + N/A N/A u48.5 -110  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
-130 N/A N/A -108 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -105  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
+110 N/A N/A -112 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -115  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A +1.5 -166 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -1.5 +124 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -108  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
o49.5 -110 o13.5 -110 + N/A o10.5 -110 + N/A N/A o13.5 -132 + N/A N/A N/A o48.5 -110  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
u49.5 -110 u13.5 -110 + N/A u10.5 -120 + N/A N/A u13.5 +106 + N/A N/A N/A u48.5 -110  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
-130 -110 + N/A even N/A N/A -106 + N/A N/A N/A -105  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
+110 -110 + N/A -130 N/A N/A -120 + N/A N/A N/A -115  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -175 + N/A N/A -1.5 +154 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +135 + N/A N/A +1.5 -210 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -108  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
o49.5 -110 o12.5 -110 + N/A o9.5 -135 + N/A N/A o9.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A o48.5 -110  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
u49.5 -110 u12.5 -110 + N/A u9.5 +105 + N/A N/A u9.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A u48.5 -110  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
-130 -110 + N/A -110 N/A N/A -113 + N/A N/A N/A -105  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
+110 -110 + N/A -120 N/A N/A -113 + N/A N/A N/A -115  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
-1.5 -110 +0.5 -165 + N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -1.5 +140 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
+1.5 -110 -0.5 +140 + N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A +1.5 -188 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -108  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
o49.5 -110 o14 -105 + N/A o14.5 +114 + N/A N/A o13.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A o48.5 -110  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
u49.5 -110 u14 -115 + N/A u14.5 -145 + N/A N/A u13.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A u48.5 -110  
Army Black Knights 347 Army
-130 -110 + N/A -115 N/A N/A -115 + N/A N/A N/A -105  
Air Force Falcons 348 Air Force
+110 -110 + N/A -115 N/A N/A -111 + N/A N/A N/A -115  

I will be the first to say it. This takes some guts! Service academy overs are a dangerous bet, but the defenses for Air Force and Army are very weak this season. Sure, both of these teams love to run the ball. However, pace is up for both of these teams, with Air Force averaging 70.9 offensive snaps per game and Army averaging 77.4 offensive snaps per game.

Army's defense is 119th in defensive success rate, and Air Force's defense is 135th in defensive success rate. These defenses are weak and these teams play fast, which should result in points.

Best Bet: Army Black Knights @ Air Force Falcons o48.5 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT HARD ROCK!

UNLV VS. NEW MEXICO BEST BET

UNM @ UNLV Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
+5.5 -110 +3 even + +3.5 -115 + +3.5 -120 + +3 even + +3.5 -130 + +2.5 -100 + +2.5 -105 + +2.5 even N/A +4.5 -110  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
-5.5 -110 -3 -120 + -3.5 -105 + -3.5 even + -3 -120 + -3.5 even + -2.5 -122 + -2.5 -130 + -2.5 -120 N/A -4.5 -110  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
o64.5 -110 o30 -105 + N/A o29.5 -108 + o29.5 -110 + N/A o31.5 +116 + o29.5 -120 + o29.5 -115 N/A o61.5 -110  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
u64.5 -110 u30 -115 + N/A u29.5 -112 + u29.5 -110 + N/A u31.5 -142 + u29.5 -115 + u29.5 -105 N/A u61.5 -110  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
+154 +150 + +145 + +142 + +143 + +140 + +138 + N/A N/A N/A +160  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
-185 -180 + -180 + -170 + -170 + -190 + -170 + N/A N/A N/A -192  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
+5.5 -110 +0.5 -105 + +0.5 -105 + +2.5 -110 + +0.5 even + N/A +1.5 -140 + +0.5 -120 + +0.5 -120 N/A +4.5 -110  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
-5.5 -110 -0.5 -125 + -0.5 -125 + -2.5 -120 + -0.5 -130 + N/A -1.5 +112 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -110 N/A -4.5 -110  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
o64.5 -110 o13.5 -120 + N/A o13.5 -125 + o13.5 -125 + N/A o13.5 -135 + o13.5 -115 + o14.5 +165 N/A o61.5 -110  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
u64.5 -110 u13.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -105 + u13.5 -105 + N/A u13.5 +108 + u13.5 -110 + u14.5 -235 N/A u61.5 -110  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
+154 +140 + +140 + +140 + +140 + N/A +124 + N/A N/A N/A +160  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
-185 -170 + -185 + -180 + -170 + N/A -158 + N/A N/A N/A -192  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
+5.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -110 + +0.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +4.5 -110  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
-5.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 -110 + -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -4.5 -110  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
o64.5 -110 N/A N/A o31.5 -105 + o31.5 -110 + N/A N/A o31.5 -110 + N/A N/A o61.5 -110  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
u64.5 -110 N/A N/A u31.5 -115 + u31.5 -110 + N/A N/A u31.5 -120 + N/A N/A u61.5 -110  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
+154 N/A N/A +124 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +160  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
-185 N/A N/A -148 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -192  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
+5.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -125 + N/A N/A N/A +4.5 -110  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
-5.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A -4.5 -110  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
o64.5 -110 o16.5 -110 + N/A o16.5 -120 + N/A N/A o17.5 +106 + N/A N/A N/A o61.5 -110  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
u64.5 -110 u16.5 -110 + N/A u16.5 -110 + N/A N/A u17.5 -132 + N/A N/A N/A u61.5 -110  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
+154 +120 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A +124 + N/A N/A N/A +160  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
-185 -140 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -158 + N/A N/A N/A -192  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
+5.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A +1.5 -160 + N/A N/A N/A +4.5 -110  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
-5.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A -1.5 +120 + N/A N/A N/A -4.5 -110  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
o64.5 -110 o14 -115 + N/A o14.5 +130 + N/A N/A o13.5 -132 + N/A N/A N/A o61.5 -110  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
u64.5 -110 u14 -105 + N/A u14.5 -166 + N/A N/A u13.5 +106 + N/A N/A N/A u61.5 -110  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
+154 +125 + N/A +120 + N/A N/A +112 + N/A N/A N/A +160  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
-185 -150 + N/A -154 + N/A N/A -142 + N/A N/A N/A -192  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
+5.5 -110 +0.5 -125 + N/A +0.5 -130 + N/A N/A +1.5 -154 + N/A N/A N/A +4.5 -110  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
-5.5 -110 -0.5 +105 + N/A -0.5 even + N/A N/A -1.5 +116 + N/A N/A N/A -4.5 -110  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
o64.5 -110 o17 -115 + N/A o16.5 -130 + N/A N/A o15.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A o61.5 -110  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
u64.5 -110 u17 -105 + N/A u16.5 even + N/A N/A u15.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A u61.5 -110  
New Mexico Lobos 371 New Mexico
+154 +115 + N/A even + N/A N/A +112 + N/A N/A N/A +160  
UNLV Rebels 372 UNLV
-185 -135 + N/A -130 + N/A N/A -142 + N/A N/A N/A -192  

This play is almost entirely contingent on UNLV. They can't tackle, their defense lacks, but their offense is explosive, and they can score at almost any time with their special teams. I think back to their game against Wyoming where they blocked two punts resulting in points.

UNLV is 16th in offensive success rate, 14th in passing success rate, and in the 85th percentile for offensive explosiveness. Both of these teams are going to be able to find the end zone early and often.

Best Bet: New Mexico Lobos @ UNLV Rebels o61.5 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT bet365!

MINNESOTA VS. MICHIGAN STATE BEST BET

MSU @ MINN Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
+5.5 -110 +1.5 -105 + +1.5 -110 + +2.5 -110 + +1.5 -110 + +2.5 -115 + +1.5 -110 + +1.5 -120 + +2.5 -110 N/A +3 -105  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
-5.5 -110 -1.5 -115 + -1.5 -110 + -2.5 -110 + -1.5 -110 + -2.5 -115 + -1.5 -110 + -1.5 -110 + -2.5 -110 N/A -3 -115  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
o44.5 -110 o21.5 -105 + N/A o21.5 -102 + o21.5 -105 + N/A o22.5 -110 + o21.5 -110 + o21.5 -105 N/A o44.5 -105  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
u44.5 -110 u21.5 -115 + N/A u21.5 -118 + u21.5 -115 + N/A u22.5 -110 + u21.5 -120 + u21.5 -115 N/A u44.5 -115  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
+170 +130 + +125 + +130 + +122 + +120 + +120 + N/A N/A N/A +130  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
-205 -155 + -150 + -155 + -145 + -150 + -148 + N/A N/A N/A -155  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
+5.5 -110 +0.5 -135 + +0.5 -145 + +0.5 -130 + +0.5 -135 + N/A +1.5 -150 + +0.5 -140 + -0.5 +175 N/A +3 -105  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
-5.5 -110 -0.5 +105 + -0.5 +110 + -0.5 even + -0.5 +105 + N/A -1.5 +120 + -0.5 +110 + +0.5 -255 N/A -3 -115  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
o44.5 -110 o9.5 -120 + N/A o9.5 -125 + o9.5 -125 + N/A o9.5 -114 + o9.5 -110 + o9.5 -125 N/A o44.5 -105  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
u44.5 -110 u9.5 -110 + N/A u9.5 -105 + u9.5 -105 + N/A u9.5 -110 + u9.5 -115 + u9.5 -105 N/A u44.5 -115  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
+170 +115 + +115 + +120 + +115 + N/A +116 + N/A N/A N/A +130  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
-205 -145 + -150 + -154 + -145 + N/A -148 + N/A N/A N/A -155  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
+5.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -125 + +0.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +3 -105  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
-5.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +105 + -0.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -3 -115  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
o44.5 -110 N/A N/A o22.5 -108 + o21.5 -105 + N/A N/A o21.5 even + N/A N/A o44.5 -105  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
u44.5 -110 N/A N/A u22.5 -112 + u21.5 -115 + N/A N/A u21.5 -130 + N/A N/A u44.5 -115  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
+170 N/A N/A +110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +130  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
-205 N/A N/A -130 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -155  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
+5.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -140 + N/A N/A --1.5 +108 + N/A N/A N/A +3 -105  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
-5.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +110 + N/A N/A +-1.5 +108 + N/A N/A N/A -3 -115  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
o44.5 -110 o12.5 -110 + N/A o10.5 -115 + N/A N/A o13.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A o44.5 -105  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
u44.5 -110 u12.5 -110 + N/A u10.5 -115 + N/A N/A u13.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A u44.5 -115  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
+170 +110 + N/A +105 + N/A N/A +108 + N/A N/A N/A +130  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
-205 -130 + N/A -135 + N/A N/A +108 + N/A N/A N/A -155  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
+5.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A +1.5 -174 + N/A N/A N/A +3 -105  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
-5.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -1.5 +130 + N/A N/A N/A -3 -115  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
o44.5 -110 o10 -105 + N/A o9.5 -115 + N/A N/A o9.5 -124 + N/A N/A N/A o44.5 -105  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
u44.5 -110 u10 -115 + N/A u9.5 -115 + N/A N/A u9.5 -100 + N/A N/A N/A u44.5 -115  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
+170 +105 + N/A +105 + N/A N/A +104 + N/A N/A N/A +130  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
-205 -125 + N/A -135 + N/A N/A +104 + N/A N/A N/A -155  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
+5.5 -110 +0.5 -155 + N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -168 + N/A N/A N/A +3 -105  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
-5.5 -110 -0.5 +130 + N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +126 + N/A N/A N/A -3 -115  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
o44.5 -110 o12.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 -105 + N/A N/A o10.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A o44.5 -105  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
u44.5 -110 u12.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -125 + N/A N/A u10.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A u44.5 -115  
Michigan State Spartans 353 Michigan State
+170 even + N/A -105 + N/A N/A +102 + N/A N/A N/A +130  
Minnesota Golden Gophers 354 Minnesota
-205 -120 + N/A -125 + N/A N/A -130 + N/A N/A N/A -155  

The difference here is defense. Michigan State ranks amongst the worst in college football in defensive success rate, pass defense, and rush defense. Minnesota, on the other hand, is 46th in defensive success rate, 39th in defensive pass success rate, and 37th in net EPA/drive.

3 points is not nearly enough for such a great talent and statistical discrepancy.

Best Bet: Minnesota Golden Gophers -3 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT bet365!

DELAWARE VS. LIBERTY BEST BET

DEL @ LIB Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
+2.5 -110 +1.5 -105 + +2.5 -110 + +2.5 -110 + +1.5 -105 + +2.5 -110 + +1.5 -114 + +1.5 -110 + +2.5 -105 N/A +3 -102  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
-2.5 -110 -1.5 -115 + -2.5 -110 + -2.5 -110 + -1.5 -115 + -2.5 -120 + -1.5 -106 + -1.5 -115 + -2.5 -115 N/A -3 -118  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
o52.5 -110 o24 -120 + N/A o24.5 -102 + o24 -120 + N/A o26.5 -112 + o24.5 -105 + o24.5 even N/A o51.5 -110  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
u52.5 -110 u24 even + N/A u24.5 -118 + u24 even + N/A u26.5 -108 + u24.5 -120 + u24.5 -120 N/A u51.5 -110  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
+130 +125 + +125 + +124 + +122 + +120 + +114 + N/A N/A N/A +136  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
-155 -150 + -150 + -148 + -145 + -150 + -142 + N/A N/A N/A -162  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -125 + +0.5 -125 + +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A +1.5 -160 + +0.5 -135 + -0.5 +170 N/A +3 -102  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
-2.5 -110 -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A -1.5 +126 + -0.5 +105 + +0.5 -245 N/A -3 -118  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
o52.5 -110 o10.5 -105 + N/A o10.5 -105 + N/A N/A o10.5 +108 + o10.5 +105 + o10.5 -110 N/A o51.5 -110  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
u52.5 -110 u10.5 -125 + N/A u10.5 -125 + N/A N/A u10.5 -132 + u10.5 -135 + u10.5 -120 N/A u51.5 -110  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
+130 +115 + +125 + +124 + +120 + N/A +104 + N/A N/A N/A +136  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
-155 -145 + -160 + -160 + -150 + N/A -132 + N/A N/A N/A -162  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -120 + +1.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +3 -102  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +102 + -1.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -3 -118  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
o52.5 -110 N/A N/A o26.5 -118 + o25.5 -105 + N/A N/A o26.5 -120 + N/A N/A o51.5 -110  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
u52.5 -110 N/A N/A u26.5 -102 + u25.5 -115 + N/A N/A u26.5 -110 + N/A N/A u51.5 -110  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
+130 N/A N/A +110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +136  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
-155 N/A N/A -130 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -162  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A +1.5 -140 + N/A N/A N/A +3 -102  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -1.5 +106 + N/A N/A N/A -3 -118  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
o52.5 -110 o14 even + N/A o13.5 -110 + N/A N/A o14.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A o51.5 -110  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
u52.5 -110 u14 -120 + N/A u13.5 -120 + N/A N/A u14.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A u51.5 -110  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
+130 +110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A +108 + N/A N/A N/A +136  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
-155 -130 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -140 + N/A N/A N/A -162  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -140 + N/A N/A +1.5 -172 + N/A N/A N/A +3 -102  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +110 + N/A N/A -1.5 +130 + N/A N/A N/A -3 -118  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
o52.5 -110 o12.5 -110 + N/A o12.5 -115 + N/A N/A o10.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A o51.5 -110  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
u52.5 -110 u12.5 -110 + N/A u12.5 -115 + N/A N/A u10.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A u51.5 -110  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
+130 +115 + N/A +110 + N/A N/A -102 + N/A N/A N/A +136  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
-155 -135 + N/A -140 + N/A N/A -125 + N/A N/A N/A -162  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -140 + N/A +0.5 -140 + N/A N/A +1.5 -154 + N/A N/A N/A +3 -102  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
-2.5 -110 -0.5 +120 + N/A -0.5 +110 + N/A N/A -1.5 +118 + N/A N/A N/A -3 -118  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
o52.5 -110 o14 -110 + N/A o14.5 -105 + N/A N/A o13.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A o51.5 -110  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
u52.5 -110 u14 -110 + N/A u14.5 -125 + N/A N/A u13.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A u51.5 -110  
Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens 397 Delaware
+130 +105 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A +106 + N/A N/A N/A +136  
Liberty Flames 398 Liberty
-155 -125 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -136 + N/A N/A N/A -162  

Delaware's offense is the difference maker in this matchup. They rank 28th in offensive success rate, and they are particularly efficient in late down situations. Liberty's defense has had trouble defending the run this year, ranking 127th in defensive rush success rate allowed.

Delaware's offense is strong enough to keep this game close for the Fightin' Blue Hens.

Best Bet: Delaware Fightin' Blue Hens +3.5 (-115)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT bet365!

SAN DIEGO STATE VS. WYOMING BEST BET

These are two amazing defenses. If you are a sucker for low-scoring affairs, it feels like this should be the headlining act. San Diego State is 5th in defensive success rate, and Wyoming's pass defense is so strong. SDSU prioritizes running the football, as shown by their 60% run play selection rate.

These teams play with average pace, but their defenses are the reason why I think this will be a low-scoring game.

Best Bet: Wyoming Cowboys @ San Diego State Aztecs u42.5 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT FANATICS!

VIRIGINA VS. CALIFORNIA BEST BET

UVA @ CAL Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
-4 -110 -2.5 -115 + -2.5 -118 + -2.5 -118 + -2.5 -115 + -2.5 -125 + -2.5 -115 + -2.5 -120 + -1.5 -120 N/A -4 -108  
California Golden Bears 370 California
+4 -110 +2.5 -105 + +2.5 -102 + +2.5 -102 + +2.5 -105 + +2.5 -105 + +2.5 -104 + +2.5 -110 + +1.5 even N/A +4 -112  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
o54.5 -110 o26.5 -105 + N/A o26.5 -110 + o26.5 -110 + N/A o27.5 +110 + o26.5 -110 + o26.5 -110 N/A o53.5 -108  
California Golden Bears 370 California
u54.5 -110 u26.5 -115 + N/A u26.5 -110 + u26.5 -110 + N/A u27.5 -134 + u26.5 -120 + u26.5 -110 N/A u53.5 -112  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
-175 -155 + -155 + -155 + -155 + -160 + -162 + N/A N/A N/A -175  
California Golden Bears 370 California
+145 +130 + +130 + +130 + +130 + +125 + +130 + N/A N/A N/A +145  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
-4 -110 -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -110 + N/A N/A -1.5 +114 + -0.5 even + -0.5 even N/A -4 -108  
California Golden Bears 370 California
+4 -110 +0.5 -125 + +0.5 -120 + +0.5 -120 + N/A N/A +1.5 -150 + +0.5 -130 + +0.5 -135 N/A +4 -112  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
o54.5 -110 o12.5 -110 + N/A o10.5 -110 + N/A N/A o10.5 +102 + o10.5 even + o10.5 -110 N/A o53.5 -108  
California Golden Bears 370 California
u54.5 -110 u12.5 -120 + N/A u10.5 -120 + N/A N/A u10.5 -128 + u10.5 -125 + u10.5 -120 N/A u53.5 -112  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
-175 -145 + -165 + -154 + -145 + N/A -150 + N/A N/A N/A -175  
California Golden Bears 370 California
+145 +115 + +130 + +120 + +115 + N/A +116 + N/A N/A N/A +145  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
-4 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 -115 + -1.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -4 -108  
California Golden Bears 370 California
+4 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -105 + +1.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +4 -112  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
o54.5 -110 N/A N/A o27.5 -108 + o27.5 even + N/A N/A o27.5 -105 + N/A N/A o53.5 -108  
California Golden Bears 370 California
u54.5 -110 N/A N/A u27.5 -112 + u27.5 -120 + N/A N/A u27.5 -125 + N/A N/A u53.5 -112  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
-175 N/A N/A -155 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -175  
California Golden Bears 370 California
+145 N/A N/A +130 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +145  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
-4 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +105 + N/A N/A -1.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A -4 -108  
California Golden Bears 370 California
+4 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -135 + N/A N/A +1.5 -136 + N/A N/A N/A +4 -112  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
o54.5 -110 o14 -110 + N/A o13.5 -135 + N/A N/A o15.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A o53.5 -108  
California Golden Bears 370 California
u54.5 -110 u14 -110 + N/A u13.5 +105 + N/A N/A u15.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A u53.5 -112  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
-175 -150 + N/A -135 + N/A N/A -154 + N/A N/A N/A -175  
California Golden Bears 370 California
+145 +125 + N/A +105 + N/A N/A +122 + N/A N/A N/A +145  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
-4 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 even + N/A N/A -1.5 +114 + N/A N/A N/A -4 -108  
California Golden Bears 370 California
+4 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -130 + N/A N/A +1.5 -148 + N/A N/A N/A +4 -112  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
o54.5 -110 o13.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 -105 + N/A N/A o12.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A o53.5 -108  
California Golden Bears 370 California
u54.5 -110 u13.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -125 + N/A N/A u12.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A u53.5 -112  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
-175 -135 + N/A -154 + N/A N/A -150 + N/A N/A N/A -175  
California Golden Bears 370 California
+145 +115 + N/A +120 + N/A N/A +114 + N/A N/A N/A +145  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
-4 -110 -0.5 +120 + N/A -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A -1.5 +110 + N/A N/A N/A -4 -108  
California Golden Bears 370 California
+4 -110 +0.5 -140 + N/A +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A +1.5 -146 + N/A N/A N/A +4 -112  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
o54.5 -110 o14.5 -110 + N/A o14.5 -105 + N/A N/A o13.5 -124 + N/A N/A N/A o53.5 -108  
California Golden Bears 370 California
u54.5 -110 u14.5 -110 + N/A u14.5 -125 + N/A N/A u13.5 -100 + N/A N/A N/A u53.5 -112  
Virginia Cavaliers 369 Virginia
-175 -125 + N/A -135 + N/A N/A -148 + N/A N/A N/A -175  
California Golden Bears 370 California
+145 +105 + N/A +105 + N/A N/A +116 + N/A N/A N/A +145  

This is the first game of the season for Virginia where they have to travel across the country to play. We have plenty of data indicating that when teams have to travel 2-3 time zones, they underperform. Think Illinois vs. Washington last week. That plays a big part in this pick.

Cal's defense is strong enough to stifle this Virginia offensive attack, especially an offense that may be out of whack thanks to the extended travel.

Best Bet: California Golden Bears +4.5 (-114)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT FANDUEL!

ARIZONA VS. COLORADO BEST BET

ARI @ COLO Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
-4.5 -110 -3 -110 + -2.5 -118 + -2.5 -118 + -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -125 -2.5 -115 + -2.5 -130 + -3.5 +105 N/A -4.5 -110  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
+4.5 -110 +3 -110 + +2.5 -102 + +2.5 -102 + +2.5 -103 + +2.5 -105 +2.5 -105 + +2.5 -105 + +3.5 -125 N/A +4.5 -110  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
o52.5 -110 o26 -115 + N/A o26.5 -108 + o26.5 -105 + N/A o27.5 +110 + o26.5 -115 + o26.5 -110 N/A o53.5 -108  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
u52.5 -110 u26 -105 + N/A u26.5 -112 + u26.5 -118 + N/A u27.5 -134 + u26.5 -115 + u26.5 -110 N/A u53.5 -112  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
-185 -165 + -165 + -162 + -165 + -180 + -162 + N/A N/A N/A -205  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
+154 +140 + +140 + +136 + +135 + +135 + +132 + N/A N/A N/A +170  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
-4.5 -110 -0.5 -110 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -110 + N/A N/A -1.5 +112 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 -105 N/A -4.5 -110  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
+4.5 -110 +0.5 -120 + +0.5 -120 + +0.5 -120 + N/A N/A +1.5 -138 + +0.5 -125 + +0.5 -125 N/A +4.5 -110  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
o52.5 -110 o10.5 -120 + N/A o12.5 -120 + N/A N/A o10.5 +102 + o10.5 -105 + o10.5 -120 N/A o53.5 -108  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
u52.5 -110 u10.5 -110 + N/A u12.5 -110 + N/A N/A u10.5 -128 + u10.5 -125 + u10.5 -110 N/A u53.5 -112  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
-185 -150 + -165 + -160 + -150 + N/A -156 + N/A N/A N/A -205  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
+154 +120 + +130 + +124 + +120 + N/A +120 + N/A N/A N/A +170  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
-4.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A -4.5 -110  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
+4.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A +4.5 -110  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
o52.5 -110 o14 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A o15.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A o53.5 -108  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
u52.5 -110 u14 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A u15.5 -116 + N/A N/A N/A u53.5 -112  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
-185 -155 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -148 + N/A N/A N/A -205  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
+154 +130 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +116 + N/A N/A N/A +170  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
-4.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 +110 + N/A N/A N/A -4.5 -110  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
+4.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -146 + N/A N/A N/A +4.5 -110  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
o52.5 -110 o13 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A o10.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A o53.5 -108  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
u52.5 -110 u13 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A u10.5 -116 + N/A N/A N/A u53.5 -112  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
-185 -150 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -156 + N/A N/A N/A -205  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
+154 +125 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +122 + N/A N/A N/A +170  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
-4.5 -110 -0.5 +115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 +108 + N/A N/A N/A -4.5 -110  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
+4.5 -110 +0.5 -135 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -144 + N/A N/A N/A +4.5 -110  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
o52.5 -110 o14 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A o13.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A o53.5 -108  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
u52.5 -110 u14 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A u13.5 +104 + N/A N/A N/A u53.5 -112  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
-185 -130 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -150 + N/A N/A N/A -205  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
+154 +110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +118 + N/A N/A N/A +170  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
-4.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -4.5 -110  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
+4.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +4.5 -110  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
o52.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A o27.5 even + N/A N/A o27.5 -105 + N/A N/A o53.5 -108  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
u52.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A u27.5 -120 + N/A N/A u27.5 -130 + N/A N/A u53.5 -112  
Arizona Wildcats 365 Arizona
-185 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -205  
Colorado Buffaloes 366 Colorado
+154 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +170  

Utah embarrassed Colorado late last Saturday. I see a similar path for Colorado this weekend. Arizona ranks 20th in net EPA/play, and 4th in net EPA/play on defense. Arizona has Colorado outmatched on paper and there is no strength of schedule adjustment that can rationalize such a big statistical gap.

Best Bet: Arizona Wildcats -4.5 (-110)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT bet365!

NEBRASKA VS. USC BEST BET

USC @ NEB Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
USC Trojans 393 USC
-4.5 -110 -3.5 -110 + -3.5 -115 + -3.5 -112 + -3.5 -110 + -3.5 -110 + -4.5 -102 + -3.5 -115 + -3.5 -110 N/A -6.5 -110  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
+4.5 -110 +3.5 -110 + +3.5 -105 + +3.5 -108 + +3.5 -110 + +3.5 -120 + +4.5 -120 + +3.5 -115 + +3.5 -110 N/A +6.5 -110  
USC Trojans 393 USC
o58.5 -108 o28.5 -115 + N/A o29.5 -112 + o28.5 -115 + N/A o30.5 -105 + o29.5 -115 + o29.5 -110 N/A o59.5 -102  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
u58.5 -112 u28.5 -105 + N/A u29.5 -108 + u28.5 -105 + N/A u30.5 -115 + u29.5 -115 + u29.5 -110 N/A u59.5 -118  
USC Trojans 393 USC
-238 -190 + N/A -185 + -190 + -200 + -215 + N/A N/A N/A -230  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
+195 +160 + N/A +154 + +158 + +150 + +172 + N/A N/A N/A +190  
USC Trojans 393 USC
-4.5 -110 -0.5 -130 + -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -120 + -0.5 -130 + N/A -2.5 -118 + -0.5 -115 + -1.5 -120 N/A -6.5 -110  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
+4.5 -110 +0.5 even + +2.5 -110 + +2.5 -110 + +0.5 even + N/A +2.5 -106 + +0.5 -110 + +1.5 -110 N/A +6.5 -110  
USC Trojans 393 USC
o58.5 -108 o13 -120 + N/A o13.5 -120 + o13 -125 + N/A o13.5 -120 + o13.5 -110 + o13.5 -110 N/A o59.5 -102  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
u58.5 -112 u13 -110 + N/A u13.5 -110 + u13 -105 + N/A u13.5 -104 + u13.5 -115 + u13.5 -120 N/A u59.5 -118  
USC Trojans 393 USC
-238 -180 + N/A -188 + -180 + N/A -215 + N/A N/A N/A -230  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
+195 +145 + N/A +145 + +150 + N/A +164 + N/A N/A N/A +190  
USC Trojans 393 USC
-4.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A -6.5 -110  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
+4.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A +6.5 -110  
USC Trojans 393 USC
o58.5 -108 o16.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A o17.5 +126 + N/A N/A N/A o59.5 -102  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
u58.5 -112 u16.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A u17.5 -158 + N/A N/A N/A u59.5 -118  
USC Trojans 393 USC
-238 -155 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -172 + N/A N/A N/A -230  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
+195 +130 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +134 + N/A N/A N/A +190  
USC Trojans 393 USC
-4.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 +124 + N/A N/A N/A -6.5 -110  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
+4.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -166 + N/A N/A N/A +6.5 -110  
USC Trojans 393 USC
o58.5 -108 o13.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A o13.5 -124 + N/A N/A N/A o59.5 -102  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
u58.5 -112 u13.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A u13.5 -100 + N/A N/A N/A u59.5 -118  
USC Trojans 393 USC
-238 -170 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -136 + N/A N/A N/A -230  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
+195 +145 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +106 + N/A N/A N/A +190  
USC Trojans 393 USC
-4.5 -110 -0.5 even + N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 +104 + N/A N/A N/A -6.5 -110  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
+4.5 -110 +0.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -138 + N/A N/A N/A +6.5 -110  
USC Trojans 393 USC
o58.5 -108 o16.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A o14.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A o59.5 -102  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
u58.5 -112 u16.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A u14.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A u59.5 -118  
USC Trojans 393 USC
-238 -150 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -156 + N/A N/A N/A -230  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
+195 +125 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +122 + N/A N/A N/A +190  
USC Trojans 393 USC
-4.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -6.5 -110  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
+4.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +6.5 -110  
USC Trojans 393 USC
o58.5 -108 N/A N/A N/A o28.5 -110 + N/A N/A o29.5 -120 + N/A N/A o59.5 -102  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
u58.5 -112 N/A N/A N/A u28.5 -110 + N/A N/A u29.5 -110 + N/A N/A u59.5 -118  
USC Trojans 393 USC
-238 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -230  
Nebraska Cornhuskers 394 Nebraska
+195 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +190  

This is another pick where I am playing against the team that has to travel multiple time zones. USC has suffered two losses this season, and in both of those losses they had to travel 2+ time zones. This is relevant in the new conference alignment, where teams are doing this more and more often. USC lost @ Notre Dame by 10 and @ Illinois by 2. They were the favorites against Illinois when they lost outright.

Nebraska should be able to take advantage of this USC defense and come out on top in this classic Big Ten matchup.

Best Bet: Nebraska Cornhuskers +6.5 (-110) + ML (+205)


PLACE THIS BET INSTANTLY AT CAESARS!

I would love to hear from you all. You can interact with me on Threads and best of luck this week!

Featured News

Dylan Wilkerson

Dylan Wilkerson

Dylan Wilkerson has over 5 years of experience reporting and analyzing the sports betting industry for various sites. His portfolio includes work for SportsHandle and Action Network, in addition to VegasInsider. His favorite sports are the NFL, College Football, The PGA Tour, the LIV Tour, and Cricket. Dylan has a broad and deep understanding of various sports-related topics. More from Dylan Wilkerson
•