Sign Up Subscribe
Featured Last Updated Nov 3 2025, 2:50 PM

College Football Week 11 Best Bets: 15 Bets For College Football Saturday

Dylan Wilkerson
Dylan Wilkerson Sports Betting Expert
5 minute read
College Football Week 11 Best Bets: 15 Bets For College Football Saturday

Image Credit: Maria Lysaker-Imagn Images

November is here, which means college football week 11 is upon us. It feels like just yesterday we were gearing up for Ohio State vs. Texas. Now, teams are playing for their playoff lives! Here are all of my best bets for week 11 of the college football action.

Google Preferred Source

First things first: to make the most of college football saturday, you want to make sure you are getting the best line and taking advantage of the best sportsbook promos. Our college football odds page has odds for every game and every major sportsbook. We also have plenty of offers for users to take advantage of, below.

UMASS VS. AKRON BEST BET

MASS @ AKR Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+9.5 -110 +6.5 -110 + +6.5 -105 + +6.5 -108 + +6.5 -112 + +6.5 -110 + +6.5 -108 + +6.5 -105 + +6.5 -110 +5.5 -106 + +10 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-9.5 -110 -6.5 -110 + -6.5 -115 + -6.5 -112 + -6.5 -112 + -6.5 -120 + -6.5 -112 + -6.5 -120 + -6.5 -110 -5.5 -118 + -10 -108  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
o47.5 -118 o24.5 -105 + N/A o24.5 -108 + o24.5 -109 + N/A o24.5 -100 + o24.5 -110 + o24.5 -105 o24.5 -108 + o49.5 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
u47.5 -102 u24.5 -115 + N/A u24.5 -112 + u24.5 -113 + N/A u24.5 -122 + u24.5 -115 + u24.5 -115 u24.5 -121 + u49.5 -108  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+295 +250 + N/A +250 + +245 + +200 + +235 + N/A N/A +225 + +280  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-375 -310 + N/A -310 + -325 + -280 + -300 + N/A N/A -315 + -355  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+9.5 -110 +3.5 -125 + +3.5 -115 + +3.5 -125 + N/A +3.5 -130 + +2.5 +102 + +3.5 -125 + +2.5 +105 +1.5 +102 + +10 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-9.5 -110 -3.5 -105 + -3.5 -110 + -3.5 -105 + N/A -3.5 even + -2.5 -128 + -3.5 even + -2.5 -140 -1.5 -134 + -10 -108  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
o47.5 -118 o10 -125 + N/A o10.5 +105 + N/A o10.5 +115 + o10.5 +116 + o10.5 +105 + o10.5 +105 o10.5 +104 + o49.5 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
u47.5 -102 u10 -105 + N/A u10.5 -135 + N/A u10.5 -145 + u10.5 -142 + u10.5 -135 + u10.5 -140 u10.5 -134 + u49.5 -108  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+295 +200 + N/A +200 + N/A +170 + +190 + N/A N/A +180 + +280  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-375 -250 + N/A -280 + N/A -240 + -250 + N/A N/A -245 + -355  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +10 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -10 -108  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
o47.5 -118 N/A N/A o23.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A o23.5 -115 + N/A N/A o49.5 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
u47.5 -102 N/A N/A u23.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A u23.5 -110 + N/A N/A u49.5 -108  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+295 N/A N/A +180 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +280  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-375 N/A N/A -218 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -355  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -105 + N/A N/A +3.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A +10 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -125 + N/A N/A -3.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A -10 -108  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
o47.5 -118 o14 -105 + N/A o13.5 -130 + N/A N/A o14.5 +120 + N/A N/A N/A o49.5 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
u47.5 -102 u14 -115 + N/A u13.5 even + N/A N/A u14.5 -148 + N/A N/A N/A u49.5 -108  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+295 +170 + N/A +160 + N/A N/A +190 + N/A N/A N/A +280  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-375 -210 + N/A -210 + N/A N/A -250 + N/A N/A N/A -355  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -115 + N/A N/A +2.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A +10 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -115 + N/A N/A -2.5 -122 + N/A N/A N/A -10 -108  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
o47.5 -118 o10.5 -105 + N/A o10.5 +105 + N/A N/A o10.5 +108 + N/A N/A N/A o49.5 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
u47.5 -102 u10.5 -115 + N/A u10.5 -135 + N/A N/A u10.5 -132 + N/A N/A N/A u49.5 -108  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+295 +190 + N/A +160 + N/A N/A +176 + N/A N/A N/A +280  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-375 -240 + N/A -210 + N/A N/A -230 + N/A N/A N/A -355  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+9.5 -110 +0.5 -110 + N/A +0.5 -110 + N/A N/A +1.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A +10 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-9.5 -110 -0.5 -110 + N/A -0.5 -120 + N/A N/A -1.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A -10 -108  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
o47.5 -118 o13 -110 + N/A o13.5 -110 + N/A N/A o13.5 -100 + N/A N/A N/A o49.5 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
u47.5 -102 u13 -110 + N/A u13.5 -120 + N/A N/A u13.5 -124 + N/A N/A N/A u49.5 -108  
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+295 +165 + N/A +130 + N/A N/A +154 + N/A N/A N/A +280  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-375 -200 + N/A -166 + N/A N/A -194 + N/A N/A N/A -355  

MACtion is BACK! Truly the most wonderful time of the year. UMass has an abysmal offense, as does Akron. The difference is that the skill difference between these two teams is not as great as the spread indicates.

UMass does have a strong rush defense, so if they can force Akron quarterback Ben Finley to try and get it done through the air, I think UMass can keep this matchup close.

Bet: UMass Minutemen +10.5 (-105)

KENT STATE VS. BALL STATE BEST BET

KENT @ BALL Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+3 -110 +0.5 -120 + N/A +0.5 -122 + +1.5 -139 + +0.5 -120 + +1.5 -130 + +0.5 -125 + +0.5 -120 N/A +1.5 -112  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-3 -110 -0.5 even + N/A -0.5 +102 + -1.5 +110 + -0.5 -110 + -1.5 +106 + -0.5 -105 + -0.5 even N/A -1.5 -108  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
o46.5 -110 o22.5 -105 + N/A o21.5 -110 + o22.5 -103 + N/A o23.5 -102 + o21.5 -115 + o21.5 -110 N/A o46.5 -110  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
u46.5 -110 u22.5 -115 + N/A u21.5 -110 + u22.5 -121 + N/A u23.5 -120 + u21.5 -115 + u21.5 -110 N/A u46.5 -110  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+105 even + N/A -102 + even + even + -100 + N/A N/A N/A +102  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-125 -120 + N/A -118 + -124 + -130 + -122 + N/A N/A N/A -122  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+3 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -142 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -112  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-3 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +120 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -108  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
o46.5 -110 N/A N/A o23.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A o23.5 -110 + N/A N/A o46.5 -110  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
u46.5 -110 N/A N/A u23.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A u23.5 -115 + N/A N/A u46.5 -110  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+105 N/A N/A -102 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +102  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-125 N/A N/A -118 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -122  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+3 -110 +0.5 -150 + N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A +0.5 -180 + +1.5 -180 + +0.5 -155 + -0.5 +155 N/A +1.5 -112  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-3 -110 -0.5 +120 + N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A -0.5 +135 + -1.5 +142 + -0.5 +120 + +0.5 -220 N/A -1.5 -108  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
o46.5 -110 o9.5 -125 + N/A o9.5 -125 + N/A o9.5 -125 + o9.5 -116 + o9.5 -115 + o10.5 +140 N/A o46.5 -110  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
u46.5 -110 u9.5 -105 + N/A u9.5 -105 + N/A u9.5 -105 + u9.5 -108 + u9.5 -110 + u10.5 -195 N/A u46.5 -110  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+105 -105 + N/A even + N/A -110 + -106 + N/A N/A N/A +102  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-125 -125 + N/A -130 + N/A -120 + -120 + N/A N/A N/A -122  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+3 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A +1.5 -154 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -112  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-3 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A -1.5 +116 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -108  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
o46.5 -110 o10.5 -105 + N/A o10.5 -115 + N/A N/A o13.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A o46.5 -110  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
u46.5 -110 u10.5 -115 + N/A u10.5 -115 + N/A N/A u13.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A u46.5 -110  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+105 -105 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -100 + N/A N/A N/A +102  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-125 -115 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -128 + N/A N/A N/A -122  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+3 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -160 + N/A N/A +1.5 -188 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -112  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-3 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +124 + N/A N/A -1.5 +140 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -108  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
o46.5 -110 o10.5 -105 + N/A o9.5 -135 + N/A N/A o9.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A o46.5 -110  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
u46.5 -110 u10.5 -115 + N/A u9.5 +105 + N/A N/A u9.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A u46.5 -110  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+105 -110 + N/A -105 + N/A N/A -104 + N/A N/A N/A +102  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-125 -110 + N/A -125 + N/A N/A -122 + N/A N/A N/A -122  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+3 -110 +0.5 -155 + N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -174 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -112  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-3 -110 -0.5 +130 + N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +130 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -108  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
o46.5 -110 o13.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 -120 + N/A N/A o12.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A o46.5 -110  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
u46.5 -110 u13.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -110 + N/A N/A u12.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A u46.5 -110  
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+105 -110 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A -102 + N/A N/A N/A +102  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-125 -110 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -125 + N/A N/A N/A -122  

This total is too high for two teams that play so slow. Kent State averages 61.1 offensive snaps per game, while Ball State is averaging 63.3 offensive snaps per game.

Both teams have limited explosives on offense, and Ball State, specifically, has less than a 1% big-time throw rate. Consequently, their explosive-play rate is in the 2nd percentile amongst all other college football teams. Wednesday's MACtion should bring us a low-scoring matchup.

Bet: Kent State Golden Flashes @ Ball State Cardinals u46.5 (-110)

JAMES MADISON VS. MARSHALL BEST BET

JMU @ MRSH Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-12.5 -110 -6.5 -125 + -7.5 even + -6.5 -130 + -7 -113 + -7.5 -105 + -7.5 -102 + N/A -7.5 even N/A -13.5 -110  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+12.5 -110 +6.5 +105 + +7.5 -120 + +6.5 +110 + +7 -109 + +7.5 -125 + +7.5 -120 + N/A +7.5 -120 N/A +13.5 -110  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
o54.5 -110 o28.5 -105 + N/A o28.5 -102 + o28.5 even + N/A o28.5 +110 + o28.5 -105 + o28.5 even N/A o55.5 -102  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
u54.5 -110 u28.5 -115 + N/A u28.5 -118 + u28.5 -124 + N/A u28.5 -134 + u28.5 -125 + u28.5 -120 N/A u55.5 -118  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-440 -350 + N/A -340 + -360 + -350 -385 + N/A N/A N/A -550  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+340 +275 + N/A +270 + +270 + +240 +290 + N/A N/A N/A +410  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-12.5 -110 -3.5 -115 + -3.5 -110 + -3.5 -115 + N/A N/A -3.5 -118 + N/A -3.5 -110 N/A -13.5 -110  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+12.5 -110 +3.5 -115 + +3.5 -115 + +3.5 -115 + N/A N/A +3.5 -106 + N/A +3.5 -120 N/A +13.5 -110  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
o54.5 -110 o13 -110 + N/A o12.5 -120 + N/A N/A o12.5 -114 + N/A o13.5 even N/A o55.5 -102  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
u54.5 -110 u13 -120 + N/A u12.5 -110 + N/A N/A u12.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -135 N/A u55.5 -118  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-440 -250 + N/A -260 + N/A N/A -310 + N/A N/A N/A -550  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+340 +200 + N/A +190 + N/A N/A +230 + N/A N/A N/A +410  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-12.5 -110 N/A N/A -6.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -13.5 -110  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+12.5 -110 N/A N/A +6.5 even + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +13.5 -110  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
o54.5 -110 N/A N/A o26.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A o55.5 -102  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
u54.5 -110 N/A N/A u26.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A u55.5 -118  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-440 N/A N/A -355 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -550  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+340 N/A N/A +280 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +410  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-12.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 -110 + N/A N/A -3.5 -132 + N/A N/A N/A -13.5 -110  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+12.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -120 + N/A N/A +3.5 -100 + N/A N/A N/A +13.5 -110  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
o54.5 -110 o16.5 -110 + N/A o16.5 -130 + N/A N/A o16.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A o55.5 -102  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
u54.5 -110 u16.5 -110 + N/A u16.5 even + N/A N/A u16.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A u55.5 -118  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-440 -260 + N/A -250 + N/A N/A -295 + N/A N/A N/A -550  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+340 +210 + N/A +190 + N/A N/A +220 + N/A N/A N/A +410  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-12.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 -125 + N/A N/A -3.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A -13.5 -110  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+12.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -105 + N/A N/A +3.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A +13.5 -110  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
o54.5 -110 o12.5 -110 + N/A o12.5 -125 + N/A N/A o12.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A o55.5 -102  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
u54.5 -110 u12.5 -110 + N/A u12.5 -105 + N/A N/A u12.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A u55.5 -118  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-440 -225 + N/A -298 + N/A N/A -290 + N/A N/A N/A -550  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+340 +190 + N/A +220 + N/A N/A +220 + N/A N/A N/A +410  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-12.5 -110 -1 -110 + N/A -3.5 -105 + N/A N/A -2.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A -13.5 -110  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+12.5 -110 +1 -110 + N/A +3.5 -125 + N/A N/A +2.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A +13.5 -110  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
o54.5 -110 o14 -110 + N/A o14.5 +120 + N/A N/A o14.5 +122 + N/A N/A N/A o55.5 -102  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
u54.5 -110 u14 -110 + N/A u14.5 -154 + N/A N/A u14.5 -156 + N/A N/A N/A u55.5 -118  
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-440 -180 + N/A -238 + N/A N/A -245 + N/A N/A N/A -550  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+340 +155 + N/A +180 + N/A N/A +180 + N/A N/A N/A +410  

Both of these teams have played easy schedules to date, but James Madison has the stats, while Marshall does not. JMU ranks 10th in Net EPA/play and is particularly stout on defense.

JMU's defense is 2nd in defensive success rate and 7th in EPA/pass attempt allowed. Marshall's rush defense is the best part of their defensive unit, but JMU quarterback Alonza Barnett III is more than capable to attack this Marshall pass defense.

Bet: James Madison Dukes -12.5 (-110)

TEMPLE VS. ARMY BEST BET

TEM @ ARMY Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+6.5 -110 +3.5 -105 + N/A +3.5 -110 + +3.5 -109 + N/A +3.5 -108 + +3.5 -115 + +3.5 -110 N/A +6.5 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-6.5 -110 -3.5 -115 + N/A -3.5 -110 + -3.5 -113 + N/A -3.5 -112 + -3.5 -115 + -3.5 -110 N/A -6.5 -115  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
o47.5 -110 o23 -115 + N/A o23.5 -110 + o23.5 -108 + N/A o23.5 -106 + o23.5 -110 + o23.5 -105 N/A o46.5 -112  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
u47.5 -110 u23 -105 + N/A u23.5 -110 + u23.5 -114 + N/A u23.5 -114 + u23.5 -120 + u23.5 -115 N/A u46.5 -108  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+180 +185 + N/A +180 + +170 + N/A +158 + N/A N/A N/A +200  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-218 -225 + N/A -218 + -218 + N/A -194 + N/A N/A N/A -245  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -122 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +6.5 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -6.5 -115  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
o47.5 -110 N/A N/A o23.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A o23.5 -115 + N/A N/A o46.5 -112  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
u47.5 -110 N/A N/A u23.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A u23.5 -115 + N/A N/A u46.5 -108  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+180 N/A N/A +154 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +200  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-218 N/A N/A -185 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -245  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+6.5 -110 +0.5 -110 + N/A +2.5 -105 + N/A N/A +1.5 -132 + +0.5 -110 + +2.5 -115 N/A +6.5 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-6.5 -110 -0.5 -120 + N/A -2.5 -125 + N/A N/A -1.5 +108 + -0.5 -115 + -2.5 -115 N/A -6.5 -115  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
o47.5 -110 o10 -110 + N/A o9.5 -125 + N/A N/A o9.5 -118 + o9.5 -130 + o10.5 +120 N/A o46.5 -112  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
u47.5 -110 u10 -120 + N/A u9.5 -105 + N/A N/A u9.5 -106 + u9.5 +105 + u10.5 -165 N/A u46.5 -108  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+180 +160 + N/A +170 + N/A N/A +134 + N/A N/A N/A +200  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-218 -200 + N/A -215 + N/A N/A -172 + N/A N/A N/A -245  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +2.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A +6.5 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -2.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A -6.5 -115  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
o47.5 -110 o13.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 even + N/A N/A o13.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A o46.5 -112  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
u47.5 -110 u13.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -130 + N/A N/A u13.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A u46.5 -108  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+180 +135 + N/A -105 + N/A N/A +142 + N/A N/A N/A +200  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-218 -160 + N/A -125 + N/A N/A -186 + N/A N/A N/A -245  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A +1.5 -146 + N/A N/A N/A +6.5 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A -1.5 +108 + N/A N/A N/A -6.5 -115  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
o47.5 -110 o10 -110 + N/A o9.5 -120 + N/A N/A o9.5 -122 + N/A N/A N/A o46.5 -112  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
u47.5 -110 u10 -110 + N/A u9.5 -110 + N/A N/A u9.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A u46.5 -108  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+180 +165 + N/A +135 + N/A N/A +134 + N/A N/A N/A +200  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-218 -200 + N/A -175 + N/A N/A -170 + N/A N/A N/A -245  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+6.5 -110 +0.5 -120 + N/A +0.5 -115 + N/A N/A +1.5 -140 + N/A N/A N/A +6.5 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-6.5 -110 -0.5 even + N/A -0.5 -115 + N/A N/A -1.5 +106 + N/A N/A N/A -6.5 -115  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
o47.5 -110 o12.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 -125 + N/A N/A o12.5 -124 + N/A N/A N/A o46.5 -112  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
u47.5 -110 u12.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -105 + N/A N/A u12.5 -100 + N/A N/A N/A u46.5 -108  
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+180 +150 + N/A +124 + N/A N/A +126 + N/A N/A N/A +200  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-218 -180 + N/A -160 + N/A N/A -158 + N/A N/A N/A -245  

I like Temple's offensive matchup in the pass game here. They currently rank 12th in EPA/pass attempt, while Army's defense is 97th against the pass. Temple's offense is very strong on early downs, while Army's late-down success rate allowed is one of the worst in college football.

Conversely, Temple's defense is strong on 3rd down, allowing a 40.6% 3rd-down success rate. I like Temple to win this game against Army.

Bet: Temple Owls +6.5 (-105) + ML (+205)

EASTERN MICHIGAN VS. BOWLING GREEN BEST BET

BGSU @ EMU Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+1.5 -110 +0.5 -115 + N/A +0.5 -112 + +1.5 -129 + N/A +1.5 -114 + +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A +2.5 -115  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-1.5 -110 -0.5 -105 + N/A -0.5 -108 + -1.5 even + N/A -1.5 -108 + -0.5 -110 + N/A N/A -2.5 -105  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
o51.5 -110 o24.5 even + N/A o24.5 even + o24.5 -103 + N/A o26.5 -106 + o24.5 -105 + N/A N/A o50.5 -115  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
u51.5 -110 u24.5 -120 + N/A u24.5 -120 + u24.5 -121 + N/A u26.5 -114 + u24.5 -125 + N/A N/A u50.5 -105  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+102 even + N/A +105 + +105 + N/A +116 + N/A N/A N/A +105  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-122 -120 + N/A -125 + -130 + N/A -142 + N/A N/A N/A -125  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -148 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -115  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +124 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -105  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
o51.5 -110 N/A N/A o25.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A o25.5 -115 + N/A N/A o50.5 -115  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
u51.5 -110 N/A N/A u25.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A u25.5 -115 + N/A N/A u50.5 -105  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+102 N/A N/A -112 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +105  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-122 N/A N/A -108 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -125  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+1.5 -110 +0.5 -150 + N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -140 + +0.5 -150 + N/A N/A +2.5 -115  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-1.5 -110 -0.5 +120 + N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +112 + -0.5 +115 + N/A N/A -2.5 -105  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
o51.5 -110 o10.5 even + N/A o10.5 -105 + N/A N/A o10.5 +114 + o10.5 +105 + N/A N/A o50.5 -115  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
u51.5 -110 u10.5 -130 + N/A u10.5 -125 + N/A N/A u10.5 -142 + u10.5 -135 + N/A N/A u50.5 -105  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+102 -105 + N/A +105 + N/A N/A +124 + N/A N/A N/A +105  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-122 -125 + N/A -135 + N/A N/A -158 + N/A N/A N/A -125  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -154 + N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -115  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +116 + N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -105  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
o51.5 -110 o14 -110 + N/A o13.5 -120 + N/A N/A o14.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A o50.5 -115  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
u51.5 -110 u14 -110 + N/A u13.5 -110 + N/A N/A u14.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A u50.5 -105  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+102 -110 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A -102 + N/A N/A N/A +105  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-122 -110 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -125 + N/A N/A N/A -125  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -175 + N/A N/A -1.5 +140 + N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -115  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +135 + N/A N/A +1.5 -188 + N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -105  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
o51.5 -110 o12.5 -110 + N/A o10.5 -105 + N/A N/A o10.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A o50.5 -115  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
u51.5 -110 u12.5 -110 + N/A u10.5 -125 + N/A N/A u10.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A u50.5 -105  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+102 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -115 + N/A N/A N/A +105  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-122 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -111 + N/A N/A N/A -125  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+1.5 -110 +0.5 -160 + N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A +1.5 -182 + N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -115  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-1.5 -110 -0.5 +135 + N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A -1.5 +136 + N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -105  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
o51.5 -110 o14 -105 + N/A o14.5 +105 + N/A N/A o13.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A o50.5 -115  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
u51.5 -110 u14 -115 + N/A u14.5 -135 + N/A N/A u13.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A u50.5 -105  
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+102 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -111 + N/A N/A N/A +105  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-122 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -115 + N/A N/A N/A -125  

Eastern Michigan's offense is rather efficient for a MAC team. They rank 46th in EPA/pass and 52nd in EPA/rush. The Eastern Michigan offense will be what makes them victorious in this MAC matchup.

The advantage for EMU is in the air, and their identity so far has been through the air. EMU has passed the ball on 55.6% of offensive snaps, so not only is the matchup advantageous, but they like to play to this particular matchup strength as it is.

Bet: Eastern Michigan Eagles -1.5 (-115)

JACKSONVILLE STATE VS. UTEP BEST BET

JVST @ UTEP Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-1.5 -110 -0.5 +105 + N/A -0.5 +105 + +1.5 -139 + N/A +1.5 -138 + -0.5 even + N/A N/A -1.5 -102  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+1.5 -110 +0.5 -125 + N/A +0.5 -125 + -1.5 +110 + N/A -1.5 +112 + +0.5 -135 + N/A N/A +1.5 -118  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
o48.5 -115 o23.5 -110 + N/A o23.5 -108 + o23.5 -110 + N/A o24.5 +112 + o23.5 -115 + N/A N/A o48.5 -115  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
u48.5 -105 u23.5 -110 + N/A u23.5 -112 + u23.5 -112 + N/A u24.5 -138 + u23.5 -115 + N/A N/A u48.5 -105  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-130 -110 + N/A -110 + -109 + N/A -105 + N/A N/A N/A -112  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+110 -110 + N/A -110 + -113 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A N/A -108  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -142 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -102  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +120 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -118  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
o48.5 -115 N/A N/A o24.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A o24.5 -110 + N/A N/A o48.5 -115  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
u48.5 -105 N/A N/A u24.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A u24.5 -120 + N/A N/A u48.5 -105  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-130 N/A N/A -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -112  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+110 N/A N/A -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -108  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-1.5 -110 -0.5 +125 + N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A +1.5 -168 + -0.5 +125 + N/A N/A -1.5 -102  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+1.5 -110 +0.5 -155 + N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -1.5 +134 + +0.5 -160 + N/A N/A +1.5 -118  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
o48.5 -115 o10 -120 + N/A o10.5 +105 + N/A N/A o9.5 -142 + o9.5 -130 + N/A N/A o48.5 -115  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
u48.5 -105 u10 -110 + N/A u10.5 -135 + N/A N/A u9.5 +114 + u9.5 +105 + N/A N/A u48.5 -105  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-130 -115 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A -102 + N/A N/A N/A -112  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+110 -115 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -125 + N/A N/A N/A -108  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +110 + N/A N/A +1.5 -168 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -102  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -140 + N/A N/A -1.5 +126 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -118  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
o48.5 -115 o13.5 -110 + N/A o11.5 -115 + N/A N/A o13.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A o48.5 -115  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
u48.5 -105 u13.5 -110 + N/A u11.5 -115 + N/A N/A u13.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A u48.5 -105  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-130 -110 + N/A -125 + N/A N/A -111 + N/A N/A N/A -112  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+110 -110 + N/A -105 + N/A N/A -115 + N/A N/A N/A -108  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -166 + N/A N/A -1.5 +146 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -102  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +130 + N/A N/A +1.5 -198 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -118  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
o48.5 -115 o13 -110 + N/A o10.5 -105 + N/A N/A o10.5 +116 + N/A N/A N/A o48.5 -115  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
u48.5 -105 u13 -110 + N/A u10.5 -125 + N/A N/A u10.5 -145 + N/A N/A N/A u48.5 -105  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-130 -110 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A -113 + N/A N/A N/A -112  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+110 -110 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -113 + N/A N/A N/A -108  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-1.5 -110 +0.5 -160 + N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +128 + N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -102  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+1.5 -110 -0.5 +135 + N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -172 + N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -118  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
o48.5 -115 o13.5 -115 + N/A o13.5 -135 + N/A N/A o13.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A o48.5 -115  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
u48.5 -105 u13.5 -105 + N/A u13.5 +105 + N/A N/A u13.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A u48.5 -105  
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-130 -110 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -128 + N/A N/A N/A -112  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+110 -110 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A -100 + N/A N/A N/A -108  

UTEP is coming into this matchup with one of the better defenses in college football. They rank 9th in defensive success rate, with a particular strength against the run. Although their defense is so strong, it evens out with their abysmal offense.

UTEP is 131st in both pass and rush offense, 133rd in early downs EPA/play, and 133rd in 3rd-down success rate. UTEP is going to stop Jacksonville State but likely won't be able to capitalize on their stops, which should result in a low-scoring affair.

Bet: Jacksonville State Gamecocks @ UTEP Miners u49.5 (-110)

TEXAS A&M VS. MISSOURI BEST BET

TA&M @ MIZ Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-6.5 -110 -3.5 -115 + N/A -3.5 -115 + -3.5 -115 + N/A -3.5 -114 + -3.5 -125 + -3.5 -110 N/A -7 -110  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+6.5 -110 +3.5 -105 + N/A +3.5 -105 + +3.5 -105 + N/A +3.5 -106 + +3.5 -105 + +3.5 -110 N/A +7 -110  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
o49.5 -110 o24 -115 + N/A o23.5 -125 + o23.5 -125 + N/A o23.5 -115 + o23.5 -130 + o24.5 +110 N/A o47.5 -115  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
u49.5 -110 u24 -105 + N/A u23.5 +105 + u23.5 +105 + N/A u23.5 -105 + u23.5 -105 + u24.5 -135 N/A u47.5 -105  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-218 -210 + N/A -218 + -210 + N/A -215 + N/A N/A N/A -278  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+180 +175 + N/A +180 + +175 + N/A +168 + N/A N/A N/A +225  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 even + -3.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -7 -110  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -120 + +3.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +7 -110  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
o49.5 -110 N/A N/A o23.5 -112 + o22.5 -115 + N/A N/A o23.5 -110 + N/A N/A o47.5 -115  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
u49.5 -110 N/A N/A u23.5 -108 + u22.5 -105 + N/A N/A u23.5 -120 + N/A N/A u47.5 -105  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-218 N/A N/A -185 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -278  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+180 N/A N/A +154 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +225  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-6.5 -110 -0.5 -120 + N/A -2.5 -120 + -0.5 -125 + N/A -1.5 +102 + -1.5 -115 + -0.5 -115 N/A -7 -110  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+6.5 -110 +0.5 -110 + N/A +2.5 -110 + +0.5 -105 + N/A +1.5 -130 + +1.5 -110 + +0.5 -115 N/A +7 -110  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
o49.5 -110 o10 -125 + N/A o10.5 even + o10 -130 + N/A o9.5 -135 + o9.5 -135 + o10.5 +115 N/A o47.5 -115  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
u49.5 -110 u10 -105 + N/A u10.5 -130 + u10 even + N/A u9.5 +110 + u9.5 +105 + u10.5 -155 N/A u47.5 -105  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-218 -180 + N/A -188 + -180 + N/A -174 + N/A N/A N/A -278  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+180 +145 + N/A +150 + +150 + N/A +136 + N/A N/A N/A +225  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -110 + N/A N/A -2.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A -7 -110  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -120 + N/A N/A +2.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A +7 -110  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
o49.5 -110 o14 -110 + N/A o13.5 -105 + N/A N/A o13.5 -116 + N/A N/A N/A o47.5 -115  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
u49.5 -110 u14 -110 + N/A u13.5 -125 + N/A N/A u13.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A u47.5 -105  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-218 -165 + N/A -154 + N/A N/A -205 + N/A N/A N/A -278  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+180 +140 + N/A +120 + N/A N/A +158 + N/A N/A N/A +225  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A -2.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A -7 -110  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A +2.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A +7 -110  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
o49.5 -110 o10 -110 + N/A o9.5 -135 + N/A N/A o10.5 +118 + N/A N/A N/A o47.5 -115  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
u49.5 -110 u10 -110 + N/A u9.5 +105 + N/A N/A u10.5 -148 + N/A N/A N/A u47.5 -105  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-218 -210 + N/A -180 + N/A N/A -215 + N/A N/A N/A -278  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+180 +175 + N/A +135 + N/A N/A +164 + N/A N/A N/A +225  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-6.5 -110 -0.5 -110 + N/A -0.5 -110 + N/A N/A -1.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A -7 -110  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+6.5 -110 +0.5 -110 + N/A +0.5 -120 + N/A N/A +1.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A +7 -110  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
o49.5 -110 o11.5 -110 + N/A o13.5 -115 + N/A N/A o12.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A o47.5 -115  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
u49.5 -110 u11.5 -110 + N/A u13.5 -115 + N/A N/A u12.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A u47.5 -105  
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-218 -170 + N/A -154 + N/A N/A -188 + N/A N/A N/A -278  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+180 +145 + N/A +120 + N/A N/A +144 + N/A N/A N/A +225  

This Texas A&M offense is one of the most fun offenses to watch in college football. With a near 5% big-time throw rate, quarterback Marcel Reed has solidified his name amongst the top of the Heisman favorites.

With that said, Missouri plays fast and can capitalize on a Texas A&M defense that has allowed 21+ points in over half of their games this season. Even with Beau Pribula out for the season, Missouri should still be able to expose the 95th-ranked Texas A&M rush defense.

Sports betting is coming to Missouri! Download the Draftkings Missouri app today by clicking the banner below!

Updated on 11/3/25

DraftKings
Bet $5 (when we go live on 12/1) Get $300 in Bonus Bets!
Bonus Code
No Code Needed
Download App!
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. 21+. Physically present in Missouri. Eligibility restrictions apply. Subject to regulatory licensing requirements. Register for a Missouri online sports wagering account starting 11/17.1 per new customer. $5+ first-time bet when we go live on 12/1 req. Excludes customers who redeem prelaunch signup offer. Max. $300 issued as non-withdrawable Bonus Bets that expire in 7 days (168 hours). Stake removed from payout. Terms: sportsbook.draftkings.com/promos. Ends 1/4/26 at 11:59 PM ET. Sponsored by DK.

Best Bet: Texas A&M Aggies @ Missouri Tigers o49.5 (-105)

DUKE VS. UCONN BEST BET

DUKE @ UCONN Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-10.5 -110 -4.5 -105 + -4.5 -110 + -5.5 -110 + -4.5 -120 + -6.5 -110 + -6.5 -108 + -4.5 -115 + -4.5 -110 N/A -9.5 -110  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+10.5 -110 +4.5 -115 + +4.5 -110 + +5.5 -110 + +4.5 -104 + +6.5 -120 + +6.5 -112 + +4.5 -115 + +4.5 -110 N/A +9.5 -110  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
o64.5 -118 o32 -110 + N/A o32.5 -110 + o32.5 -115 + N/A o33.5 -114 + o32.5 -115 + o32.5 -110 N/A o65.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
u64.5 -102 u32 -110 + N/A u32.5 -110 + u32.5 -107 + N/A u33.5 -106 + u32.5 -115 + u32.5 -110 N/A u65.5 -105  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-310 -230 + N/A -238 + -235 + -260 + -250 + N/A N/A N/A -340  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+250 +190 + N/A +195 + +190 + +190 + +205 + N/A N/A N/A +270  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-10.5 -110 -3 -115 + -3 -115 + -3.5 -105 + N/A N/A -2.5 -118 + -2.5 -120 + -3.5 -105 N/A -9.5 -110  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+10.5 -110 +3 -115 + +3 -115 + +3.5 -125 + N/A N/A +2.5 -106 + +2.5 -105 + +3.5 -125 N/A +9.5 -110  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
o64.5 -118 o14 -120 + N/A o14.5 +124 + N/A N/A o13.5 -166 + o13.5 -150 + o14.5 +110 N/A o65.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
u64.5 -102 u14 -110 + N/A u14.5 -160 + N/A N/A u13.5 +132 + u13.5 +115 + u14.5 -150 N/A u65.5 -105  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-310 -200 + N/A -210 + N/A N/A -215 + N/A N/A N/A -340  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+250 +160 + N/A +160 + N/A N/A +164 + N/A N/A N/A +270  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A -4.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -9.5 -110  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A +4.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +9.5 -110  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
o64.5 -118 N/A N/A o33.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A o34.5 -105 + N/A N/A o65.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
u64.5 -102 N/A N/A u33.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A u34.5 -125 + N/A N/A u65.5 -105  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-310 N/A N/A -230 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -340  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+250 N/A N/A +190 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +270  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 -115 + N/A N/A -3.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A -9.5 -110  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -115 + N/A N/A +3.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A +9.5 -110  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
o64.5 -118 o17 -115 + N/A o17.5 even + N/A N/A o19.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A o65.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
u64.5 -102 u17 -105 + N/A u17.5 -130 + N/A N/A u19.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A u65.5 -105  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-310 -185 + N/A -175 + N/A N/A -220 + N/A N/A N/A -340  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+250 +155 + N/A +135 + N/A N/A +176 + N/A N/A N/A +270  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -120 + N/A N/A -2.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A -9.5 -110  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -110 + N/A N/A +2.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A +9.5 -110  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
o64.5 -118 o14.5 -105 + N/A o14.5 +110 + N/A N/A o14.5 +130 + N/A N/A N/A o65.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
u64.5 -102 u14.5 -115 + N/A u14.5 -140 + N/A N/A u14.5 -164 + N/A N/A N/A u65.5 -105  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-310 -180 + N/A -230 + N/A N/A -210 + N/A N/A N/A -340  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+250 +150 + N/A +170 + N/A N/A +162 + N/A N/A N/A +270  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-10.5 -110 -0.5 -110 + N/A -0.5 -125 + N/A N/A -1.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A -9.5 -110  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+10.5 -110 +0.5 -110 + N/A +0.5 -105 + N/A N/A +1.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A +9.5 -110  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
o64.5 -118 o19 -110 + N/A o17.5 -110 + N/A N/A o16.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A o65.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
u64.5 -102 u19 -110 + N/A u17.5 -120 + N/A N/A u16.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A u65.5 -105  
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-310 -150 + N/A -166 + N/A N/A -186 + N/A N/A N/A -340  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+250 +125 + N/A +130 + N/A N/A +148 + N/A N/A N/A +270  

This Duke offense is FUN. Darian Mensah has one of the highest PFF grades amongst college quarterbacks, and the near 5% big-time throw rate is very strong. Duke also loves to pass the ball, as they have run passing plays on 61.3% of offensive snaps.

Conversely, Duke's defense is weak enough to give UConn a path to the end zone. UConn's pass offense is 10th, while Duke's pass defense is 113th. While neither team plays fast, I think they will both be efficient enough to make this a high-scoring affair.

Best Bet: Duke Blue Devils @ UConn Huskies o65.5 (-110)

TEXAS STATE VS. LOUISIANA BEST BET

TXST @ UL Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-3 -110 -0.5 -110 + N/A -0.5 -110 + -1.5 even + -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -114 + -0.5 -115 + -0.5 -110 N/A -3 -102  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+3 -110 +0.5 -110 + N/A +0.5 -110 + +1.5 -129 + +2.5 -110 + +2.5 -106 + +0.5 -115 + +0.5 -110 N/A +3 -118  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
o64.5 -115 o31 -110 + N/A o30.5 -120 + o30.5 -120 + N/A o33.5 -102 + o30.5 -125 + o29.5 -135 N/A o64.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
u64.5 -105 u31 -110 + N/A u30.5 even + u30.5 -104 + N/A u33.5 -120 + u30.5 -105 + u29.5 +110 N/A u64.5 -110  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-142 -125 + N/A -125 + -127 + -150 + -158 + N/A N/A N/A -135  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+120 +105 + N/A +105 + +105 + +120 + +128 + N/A N/A N/A +114  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-3 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +110 + -0.5 +105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -3 -102  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+3 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -130 + +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +3 -118  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
o64.5 -115 N/A N/A o33.5 -110 + o33.5 -110 + N/A N/A o33.5 -115 + N/A N/A o64.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
u64.5 -105 N/A N/A u33.5 -110 + u33.5 -110 + N/A N/A u33.5 -115 + N/A N/A u64.5 -110  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-142 N/A N/A -125 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -135  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+120 N/A N/A +105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +114  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-3 -110 -0.5 +110 + N/A -0.5 +105 + -0.5 +105 + N/A -1.5 +104 + -0.5 +110 + -0.5 +110 N/A -3 -102  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+3 -110 +0.5 -140 + N/A +0.5 -135 + +0.5 -135 + N/A +1.5 -130 + +0.5 -140 + +0.5 -150 N/A +3 -118  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
o64.5 -115 o14 -115 + N/A o13.5 -160 + o13.5 -160 + N/A o13.5 -156 + o13.5 -135 + o14.5 +130 N/A o64.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
u64.5 -105 u14 -115 + N/A u13.5 +124 + u13.5 +130 + N/A u13.5 +122 + u13.5 +105 + u14.5 -180 N/A u64.5 -110  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-142 -125 + N/A -130 + -130 + N/A -172 + N/A N/A N/A -135  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+120 -105 + N/A even + even + N/A +134 + N/A N/A N/A +114  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-3 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +108 + N/A N/A N/A -3 -102  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+3 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -140 + N/A N/A N/A +3 -118  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
o64.5 -115 o17 -110 + N/A o16.5 -125 + N/A N/A o19.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A o64.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
u64.5 -105 u17 -110 + N/A u16.5 -105 + N/A N/A u19.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A u64.5 -110  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-142 -125 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -136 + N/A N/A N/A -135  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+120 +105 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A +106 + N/A N/A N/A +114  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-3 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A +1.5 -182 + N/A N/A N/A -3 -102  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+3 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A -1.5 +136 + N/A N/A N/A +3 -118  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
o64.5 -115 o14.5 -110 + N/A o14.5 +114 + N/A N/A o13.5 -148 + N/A N/A N/A o64.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
u64.5 -105 u14.5 -110 + N/A u14.5 -145 + N/A N/A u13.5 +122 + N/A N/A N/A u64.5 -110  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-142 -120 + N/A -135 + N/A N/A -106 + N/A N/A N/A -135  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+120 even + N/A +105 + N/A N/A -120 + N/A N/A N/A +114  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-3 -110 -0.5 +120 + N/A -0.5 +110 + N/A N/A -1.5 +120 + N/A N/A N/A -3 -102  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+3 -110 +0.5 -140 + N/A +0.5 -140 + N/A N/A +1.5 -160 + N/A N/A N/A +3 -118  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
o64.5 -115 o19.5 -110 + N/A o17.5 -115 + N/A N/A o16.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A o64.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
u64.5 -105 u19.5 -110 + N/A u17.5 -115 + N/A N/A u16.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A u64.5 -110  
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-142 -115 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -136 + N/A N/A N/A -135  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+120 -105 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A +106 + N/A N/A N/A +114  

The statistical discrepancy between these two teams is far too wide to rationalize this short of a betting line. Normally, I can adjust the stats for strength of schedule, but according to PFF, Texas State has played a tougher schedule to date than Louisiana.

Offensively, Texas State has an advantage in both the air and ground. Louisiana's defense is 108th in defensive success rate and 124th in net EPA/drive.

Take Texas State before this gets to 3.5 or higher.

Best Bet: Texas State Bobcats -2.5 (-105)

AIR FORCE VS. SAN JOSE STATE BEST BET

AFA @ SJSU Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+2.5 -110 +2.5 -110 + N/A +2.5 -108 + +3 -114 + +3.5 -125 +3.5 -120 + +2.5 -110 + +2.5 -105 N/A +3.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-2.5 -110 -2.5 -110 + N/A -2.5 -112 + -3 -108 + -3.5 -105 -3.5 -102 + -2.5 -120 + -2.5 -115 N/A -3.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
o65.5 -108 o31.5 -110 + N/A o31.5 -110 + o31.5 -115 + N/A o34.5 +106 + o31.5 -115 + o32.5 -110 N/A o67.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
u65.5 -112 u31.5 -110 + N/A u31.5 -110 + u31.5 -108 + N/A u34.5 -130 + u31.5 -115 + u32.5 -110 N/A u67.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+145 +130 + N/A +124 + +125 + +135 +138 + N/A N/A N/A +154  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-175 -155 + N/A -148 + -159 + -180 -172 + N/A N/A N/A -185  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +3.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -3.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
o65.5 -108 N/A N/A o34.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A o34.5 -115 + N/A N/A o67.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
u65.5 -112 N/A N/A u34.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A u34.5 -115 + N/A N/A u67.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+145 N/A N/A +140 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +154  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-175 N/A N/A -166 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -185  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -110 + N/A +0.5 -115 + N/A N/A +1.5 -124 + +0.5 -125 + +0.5 -120 N/A +3.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-2.5 -110 -0.5 -120 + N/A -0.5 -115 + N/A N/A -1.5 -100 + -0.5 even + -0.5 -110 N/A -3.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
o65.5 -108 o14 -120 + N/A o14.5 +130 + N/A N/A o14.5 +140 + o13.5 -150 + o14.5 +125 N/A o67.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
u65.5 -112 u14 -110 + N/A u14.5 -166 + N/A N/A u14.5 -180 + u13.5 +115 + u14.5 -170 N/A u67.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+145 +130 + N/A +130 + N/A N/A +144 + N/A N/A N/A +154  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-175 -160 + N/A -166 + N/A N/A -186 + N/A N/A N/A -185  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A +1.5 -136 + N/A N/A N/A +3.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -1.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A -3.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
o65.5 -108 o17.5 -105 + N/A o17.5 +105 + N/A N/A o20.5 +104 + N/A N/A N/A o67.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
u65.5 -112 u17.5 -115 + N/A u17.5 -135 + N/A N/A u20.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A u67.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+145 +110 + N/A -110 + N/A N/A +114 + N/A N/A N/A +154  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-175 -130 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -146 + N/A N/A N/A -185  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -115 + N/A N/A +1.5 -174 + N/A N/A N/A +3.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -115 + N/A N/A -1.5 +130 + N/A N/A N/A -3.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
o65.5 -108 o14.5 -110 + N/A o14.5 +120 + N/A N/A o14.5 +132 + N/A N/A N/A o67.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
u65.5 -112 u14.5 -110 + N/A u14.5 -154 + N/A N/A u14.5 -166 + N/A N/A N/A u67.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+145 +110 + N/A +140 + N/A N/A +104 + N/A N/A N/A +154  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-175 -130 + N/A -180 + N/A N/A -136 + N/A N/A N/A -185  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -135 + N/A +0.5 -145 + N/A N/A +1.5 -182 + N/A N/A N/A +3.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-2.5 -110 -0.5 +115 + N/A -0.5 +114 + N/A N/A -1.5 +136 + N/A N/A N/A -3.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
o65.5 -108 o19.5 -110 + N/A o19.5 -125 + N/A N/A o17.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A o67.5 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
u65.5 -112 u19.5 -110 + N/A u19.5 -105 + N/A N/A u17.5 -122 + N/A N/A N/A u67.5 -112  
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+145 even + N/A -110 + N/A N/A -111 + N/A N/A N/A +154  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-175 -120 + N/A -120 + N/A N/A -115 + N/A N/A N/A -185  

Air Force's offense is shockingly effective for a service academy. They rank 3rd in EPA/pass play and 10th in EPA/rush. Overall they rank 9th in offensive success rate, so Air Force will be primed to pick apart this 105th rated defenses in San Jose State.

Air Force's defense is not good, but SJSU is not the team to take advantage of this. I like Air Force to come out on top in this Mountain West matchup.

Best Bet: Air Force Falcons +5.5 (-115) + ML (+170)

FLORIDA STATE VS. CLEMSON BEST BET

FSU @ CLEM Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+16.5 -110 +0.5 -115 + N/A +0.5 -110 + +0.5 -115 + +9.5 -115 +1.5 -118 + N/A +0.5 -115 N/A +2.5 -112  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-16.5 -110 -0.5 -105 + N/A -0.5 -110 + -0.5 -105 + -9.5 -115 -1.5 -104 + N/A -0.5 -105 N/A -2.5 -108  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
o55.5 -110 o27 -115 + N/A o27.5 -102 + o27 -115 + N/A o28.5 +104 + N/A o26.5 -125 N/A o56.5 -105  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
u55.5 -110 u27 -105 + N/A u27.5 -118 + u27 -105 + N/A u28.5 -128 + N/A u26.5 +105 N/A u56.5 -115  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+525 even + N/A +110 + even + N/A +110 + N/A N/A N/A +110  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-750 -120 + N/A -130 + -120 + N/A -134 + N/A N/A N/A -130  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+16.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +124 + +0.5 -125 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -112  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-16.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -148 + -0.5 +105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -108  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
o55.5 -110 N/A N/A o28.5 -110 + o27.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A o56.5 -105  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
u55.5 -110 N/A N/A u28.5 -110 + u27.5 even + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A u56.5 -115  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+525 N/A N/A -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +110  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-750 N/A N/A -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -130  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+16.5 -110 +0.5 -145 + N/A +0.5 -135 + +0.5 -145 + N/A +1.5 -150 + N/A -0.5 +140 N/A +2.5 -112  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-16.5 -110 -0.5 +115 + N/A -0.5 +105 + -0.5 +115 + N/A -1.5 +120 + N/A +0.5 -195 N/A -2.5 -108  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
o55.5 -110 o12.5 -125 + N/A o13.5 -110 + o12.5 -130 + N/A o12.5 -118 + N/A o12.5 -120 N/A o56.5 -105  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
u55.5 -110 u12.5 -105 + N/A u13.5 -120 + u12.5 even + N/A u12.5 -106 + N/A u12.5 -110 N/A u56.5 -115  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+525 -105 + N/A +105 + even + N/A +112 + N/A N/A N/A +110  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-750 -125 + N/A -135 + -130 + N/A -142 + N/A N/A N/A -130  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+16.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A +1.5 -158 + N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -112  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-16.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -1.5 +118 + N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -108  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
o55.5 -110 o15.5 -110 + N/A o14.5 +105 + N/A N/A o16.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A o56.5 -105  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
u55.5 -110 u15.5 -110 + N/A u14.5 -135 + N/A N/A u16.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A u56.5 -115  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+525 -105 + N/A -105 + N/A N/A -104 + N/A N/A N/A +110  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-750 -115 + N/A -125 + N/A N/A -122 + N/A N/A N/A -130  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+16.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -175 + N/A N/A -1.5 +140 + N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -112  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-16.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +135 + N/A N/A +1.5 -188 + N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -108  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
o55.5 -110 o13.5 -120 + N/A o13.5 -135 + N/A N/A o12.5 -122 + N/A N/A N/A o56.5 -105  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
u55.5 -110 u13.5 even + N/A u13.5 +105 + N/A N/A u12.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A u56.5 -115  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+525 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -115 + N/A N/A N/A +110  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-750 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -111 + N/A N/A N/A -130  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+16.5 -110 +0.5 -155 + N/A -0.5 +120 + N/A N/A -1.5 +136 + N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -112  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-16.5 -110 -0.5 +130 + N/A +0.5 -154 + N/A N/A +1.5 -182 + N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -108  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
o55.5 -110 o14.5 -110 + N/A o14.5 -120 + N/A N/A o14.5 +112 + N/A N/A N/A o56.5 -105  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
u55.5 -110 u14.5 -110 + N/A u14.5 -110 + N/A N/A u14.5 -140 + N/A N/A N/A u56.5 -115  
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+525 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -115 + N/A N/A N/A +110  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-750 -110 + N/A -115 + N/A N/A -111 + N/A N/A N/A -130  

The Seminole's advantages in this matchup are plentiful. Their 15th ranked pass offense will face up against Clemson's 63rd rated pass defense, and FSU's offensive success rate ranks 19th in college football.

FSU also has the benefit of cruising to a win against Wake Forest last week while Clemson was involved in a close matchup against Duke that ended in heart-break. FSU is going to be well rested and poised to take care of their statistical advantages against the Tigers.

Best Bet: Florida State Seminoles +2.5 (-110)

NEVADA VS. UTAH STATE BEST BET

NEV @ USU Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+10.5 -110 +6 -105 + N/A +6.5 -112 + +6.5 -112 + N/A +6.5 -110 + N/A +6.5 -115 N/A +9.5 -108  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-10.5 -110 -6 -115 + N/A -6.5 -108 + -6.5 -112 + N/A -6.5 -112 + N/A -6.5 -105 N/A -9.5 -112  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
o52.5 -112 o27 -105 + N/A o26.5 -118 + o26.5 -117 + N/A o27.5 -100 + N/A o25.5 -125 N/A o52.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
u52.5 -108 u27 -115 + N/A u26.5 -102 + u26.5 -106 + N/A u27.5 -124 + N/A u25.5 +105 N/A u52.5 -108  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+310 +240 + N/A +235 + +235 + N/A +225 + N/A N/A N/A +270  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-395 -300 + N/A -290 + -320 + N/A -290 + N/A N/A N/A -340  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+10.5 -110 +3.5 -125 + N/A +3.5 -120 + N/A N/A +3.5 -128 + N/A +2.5 +105 N/A +9.5 -108  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-10.5 -110 -3.5 -105 + N/A -3.5 -110 + N/A N/A -3.5 +102 + N/A -2.5 -140 N/A -9.5 -112  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
o52.5 -112 o10.5 -115 + N/A o12.5 -115 + N/A N/A o10.5 -106 + N/A o10.5 -115 N/A o52.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
u52.5 -108 u10.5 -115 + N/A u12.5 -115 + N/A N/A u10.5 -118 + N/A u10.5 -115 N/A u52.5 -108  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+310 +190 + N/A +180 + N/A N/A +190 + N/A N/A N/A +270  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-395 -240 + N/A -238 + N/A N/A -250 + N/A N/A N/A -340  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +3.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A +9.5 -108  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -3.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A -9.5 -112  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
o52.5 -112 o14 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A o15.5 -106 + N/A N/A N/A o52.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
u52.5 -108 u14 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A u15.5 -118 + N/A N/A N/A u52.5 -108  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+310 +185 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +172 + N/A N/A N/A +270  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-395 -230 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -225 + N/A N/A N/A -340  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A +9.5 -108  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A -9.5 -112  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
o52.5 -112 o13 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A o12.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A o52.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
u52.5 -108 u13 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A u12.5 -112 + N/A N/A N/A u52.5 -108  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+310 +160 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +158 + N/A N/A N/A +270  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-395 -190 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -205 + N/A N/A N/A -340  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+10.5 -110 +0.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A +9.5 -108  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-10.5 -110 -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A -9.5 -112  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
o52.5 -112 o13.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A o13.5 -122 + N/A N/A N/A o52.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
u52.5 -108 u13.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A u13.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A u52.5 -108  
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+310 +135 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +140 + N/A N/A N/A +270  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-395 -165 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -186 + N/A N/A N/A -340  

Nevada's offense really struggles to move the ball. So far this season, the Wolfpack are 6-2 to the under highlighting their offensive deficiencies and strong pass defense. Nevada also plays extremely slow, averaging 63.6 offensive snaps per game.

Nevada ranks 135th in offense EPA/drive and 128th in offensive success rate. Nevada is the reason why this game will be low-scoring.

Best Bet: Nevada Wolf Pack @ Utah State Aggies u53.5 (-110)

SAN DIEGO STATE VS. HAWAI'I BEST BET

SDSU @ HAW Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-2.5 -110 -3 -120 + N/A -3.5 -105 + -3 -120 + N/A -3.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A -7 -105  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+2.5 -110 +3 even + N/A +3.5 -115 + +3 even + N/A +3.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A +7 -115  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
o51.5 -102 o24.5 -105 + N/A o24.5 -110 + o24.5 -110 + N/A o24.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A o50.5 -110  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
u51.5 -118 u24.5 -115 + N/A u24.5 -110 + u24.5 -110 + N/A u24.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A u50.5 -110  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-192 -185 + N/A -180 + -178 + N/A -194 + N/A N/A N/A -258  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+160 +155 + N/A +150 + +150 + N/A +156 + N/A N/A N/A +210  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-2.5 -110 -0.5 -115 + N/A -1.5 -115 + -0.5 -115 + N/A -1.5 +106 + N/A N/A N/A -7 -105  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -115 + N/A +1.5 -115 + +0.5 -115 + N/A +1.5 -132 + N/A N/A N/A +7 -115  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
o51.5 -102 o10.5 even + N/A o10.5 -105 + o10.5 even + N/A o10.5 +120 + N/A N/A N/A o50.5 -110  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
u51.5 -118 u10.5 -130 + N/A u10.5 -125 + u10.5 -130 + N/A u10.5 -150 + N/A N/A N/A u50.5 -110  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-192 -160 + N/A -175 + -160 + N/A -162 + N/A N/A N/A -258  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+160 +130 + N/A +135 + +130 + N/A +126 + N/A N/A N/A +210  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -130 + N/A N/A N/A -7 -105  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -102 + N/A N/A N/A +7 -115  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
o51.5 -102 o13.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A o14.5 +116 + N/A N/A N/A o50.5 -110  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
u51.5 -118 u13.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A u14.5 -145 + N/A N/A N/A u50.5 -110  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-192 -170 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -200 + N/A N/A N/A -258  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+160 +145 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +154 + N/A N/A N/A +210  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -108 + N/A N/A N/A -7 -105  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -122 + N/A N/A N/A +7 -115  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
o51.5 -102 o12.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A o10.5 +102 + N/A N/A N/A o50.5 -110  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
u51.5 -118 u12.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A u10.5 -128 + N/A N/A N/A u50.5 -110  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-192 -190 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -184 + N/A N/A N/A -258  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+160 +160 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +142 + N/A N/A N/A +210  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-2.5 -110 -0.5 -105 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -2.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A -7 -105  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -115 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +2.5 -114 + N/A N/A N/A +7 -115  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
o51.5 -102 o13.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A o13.5 -104 + N/A N/A N/A o50.5 -110  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
u51.5 -118 u13.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A u13.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A u50.5 -110  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-192 -170 + N/A N/A N/A N/A -205 + N/A N/A N/A -258  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+160 +145 + N/A N/A N/A N/A +158 + N/A N/A N/A +210  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A -3.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -7 -105  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A N/A +3.5 -110 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +7 -115  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
o51.5 -102 N/A N/A N/A o23.5 -120 + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A o50.5 -110  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
u51.5 -118 N/A N/A N/A u23.5 even + N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A u50.5 -110  
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-192 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -258  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+160 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +210  

Drink your coffee because we are going to be staying up late for this matchup on the island!

San Diego State's defense is first class. They are the top pass defense in terms of EPA/pass, they are 3rd in defensive success rate, and 4th on early downs EPA/play allowed. Hawai'i just simply can not match up against this SDSU defense, so I expect the Aztecs to win big in this late night Mountain West matchup.

Best Bet: San Diego State Aztecs -7 (-105)

I would love to hear from you all. You can interact with me on Threads and best of luck this week!

Featured News

Dylan Wilkerson

Dylan Wilkerson

Dylan Wilkerson has over 5 years of experience reporting and analyzing the sports betting industry for various sites. His portfolio includes work for SportsHandle and Action Network, in addition to VegasInsider. His favorite sports are the NFL, College Football, The PGA Tour, the LIV Tour, and Cricket. Dylan has a broad and deep understanding of various sports-related topics. More from Dylan Wilkerson
•