Sign Up Subscribe
Featured

College Football Week 11 Best Bets: 15 Bets For College Football Saturday

Dylan Wilkerson
Dylan Wilkerson Sports Betting Expert
5 minute read
College Football Week 11 Best Bets: 15 Bets For College Football Saturday

Image Credit: Maria Lysaker-Imagn Images

November is here, which means college football week 11 is upon us. It feels like just yesterday we were gearing up for Ohio State vs. Texas. Now, teams are playing for their playoff lives! Here are all of my best bets for week 11 of the college football action.

Google Preferred Source

First things first: to make the most of college football saturday, you want to make sure you are getting the best line and taking advantage of the best sportsbook promos. Our college football odds page has odds for every game and every major sportsbook. We also have plenty of offers for users to take advantage of, below.

Looking for NFL Best bets? Check out my complete list of NFL Week 10 best bets and my favorite NFL week 10 fantasy matchups.

UMASS VS. AKRON BEST BET

MASS @ AKR Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+9.5 -110 +7 -105 +7 -105 +7.5 -125 +7.5 -127 +6.5 -108 +6.5 -105 +15.5 -110 +6.5 -109 +12.5 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-9.5 -110 -7 -115 -7 -115 -7.5 +105 -7.5 even -6.5 -112 -6.5 -125 -15.5 -120 -6.5 -117 -12.5 -108  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
o47.5 -118 o25.5 -110 N/A o25.5 -112 o26.5 even o27.5 -110 o24.5 -105 o33.5 -115 o26.5 -109 o51.5 -108  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
u47.5 -102 u25.5 -110 N/A u25.5 -108 u26.5 -124 u27.5 -132 u24.5 -125 u33.5 -115 u26.5 -118 u51.5 -112  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+295 +320 +300 +310 +295 +225 N/A N/A +225 +360  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-375 -400 -375 -410 -390 -290 N/A N/A -315 -500  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+9.5 -110 +3.5 -120 +3.5 -120 +3.5 -115 N/A +2.5 -112 +1.5 -115 +12.5 -120 +1.5 -110 +12.5 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-9.5 -110 -3.5 -110 -3.5 -105 -3.5 -115 N/A -2.5 -112 -1.5 -115 -12.5 -110 -1.5 -118 -12.5 -108  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
o47.5 -118 o10.5 even N/A o10.5 even N/A o10.5 +114 o9.5 -140 o14.5 -150 o10.5 -105 o51.5 -108  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
u47.5 -102 u10.5 -130 N/A u10.5 -130 N/A u10.5 -142 u9.5 +110 u14.5 +110 u10.5 -125 u51.5 -112  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+295 +210 +190 +210 N/A +164 N/A N/A +160 +360  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-375 -270 -250 -280 N/A -215 N/A N/A -210 -500  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +4.5 -115 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +12.5 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -4.5 -105 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -12.5 -108  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
o47.5 -118 N/A N/A o24.5 -112 N/A N/A o24.5 -105 N/A N/A o51.5 -108  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
u47.5 -102 N/A N/A u24.5 -108 N/A N/A u24.5 -125 N/A N/A u51.5 -112  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+295 N/A N/A +185 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +360  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-375 N/A N/A -225 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -500  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -110 N/A +3.5 -110 +3.5 -120 N/A N/A +12.5 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 -120 N/A -3.5 -120 -3.5 -105 N/A N/A -12.5 -108  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
o47.5 -118 o14 -110 N/A o13.5 -135 N/A o12.5 -120 o14.5 +110 N/A N/A o51.5 -108  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
u47.5 -102 u14 -110 N/A u13.5 +105 N/A u12.5 -108 u14.5 -140 N/A N/A u51.5 -112  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+295 +190 N/A +210 N/A +200 N/A N/A N/A +360  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-375 -225 N/A -280 N/A -295 N/A N/A N/A -500  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+9.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -105 N/A +3.5 -108 +3.5 -125 N/A N/A +12.5 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-9.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -125 N/A -3.5 -122 -3.5 even N/A N/A -12.5 -108  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
o47.5 -118 o10 -115 N/A o10.5 -115 N/A o9.5 -138 o10.5 even N/A N/A o51.5 -108  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
u47.5 -102 u10 -105 N/A u10.5 -115 N/A u9.5 +106 u10.5 -125 N/A N/A u51.5 -112  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+295 +210 N/A +175 N/A +250 N/A N/A N/A +360  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-375 -260 N/A -238 N/A -340 N/A N/A N/A -500  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+9.5 -110 +2.5 -110 N/A +0.5 -115 N/A +2.5 -110 +0.5 -110 N/A N/A +12.5 -112  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-9.5 -110 -2.5 -110 N/A -0.5 -115 N/A -2.5 -120 -0.5 -115 N/A N/A -12.5 -108  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
o47.5 -118 o14 -110 N/A o13.5 -125 N/A o13.5 -112 o13.5 -125 N/A N/A o51.5 -108  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
u47.5 -102 u14 -110 N/A u13.5 -105 N/A u13.5 -112 u13.5 -105 N/A N/A u51.5 -112  
Final
UMass Minutemen 103 UMass
+295 +170 N/A +120 N/A +164 N/A N/A N/A +360  
Akron Zips 104 Akron
-375 -200 N/A -154 N/A -215 N/A N/A N/A -500  

MACtion is BACK! Truly the most wonderful time of the year. UMass has an abysmal offense, as does Akron. The difference is that the skill difference between these two teams is not as great as the spread indicates.

UMass does have a strong rush defense, so if they can force Akron quarterback Ben Finley to try and get it done through the air, I think UMass can keep this matchup close.

Bet: UMass Minutemen +10.5 (-105)

KENT STATE VS. BALL STATE BEST BET

KENT @ BALL Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+3 -110 +1.5 -110 +1.5 -115 +2.5 -110 +1.5 -108 +1.5 -128 +1.5 -110 +0.5 -115 +1.5 -121 +3 -115  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-3 -110 -1.5 -110 -1.5 -105 -2.5 -110 -1.5 -115 -1.5 +104 -1.5 -110 -0.5 -115 -1.5 -125 -3 -105  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
o46.5 -110 o23.5 -115 o23.5 -118 o23.5 -112 o23.5 -112 o24.5 +122 o23.5 -115 o26.5 -105 o24.5 -118 o48.5 -112  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
u46.5 -110 u23.5 -105 u23.5 -102 u23.5 -108 u23.5 -110 u24.5 -154 u23.5 -115 u26.5 -125 u24.5 -127 u48.5 -108  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+105 +125 +115 +124 +115 -100 N/A N/A +110 +130  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-125 -150 -140 -148 -143 -122 N/A N/A -157 -155  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+3 -110 +0.5 -140 +0.5 -130 +0.5 -135 N/A -1.5 +138 -0.5 +145 +2.5 -115 +1.5 -162 +3 -115  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-3 -110 -0.5 +110 -0.5 even -0.5 +105 N/A +1.5 -174 +0.5 -190 -2.5 -115 -1.5 +123 -3 -105  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
o46.5 -110 o9.5 -130 o9.5 -135 o9.5 -130 N/A o9.5 -140 o9.5 -120 o10.5 -150 o9.5 -112 o48.5 -112  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
u46.5 -110 u9.5 even u9.5 even u9.5 even N/A u9.5 +110 u9.5 -110 u10.5 +110 u9.5 -117 u48.5 -108  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+105 +105 +110 +120 N/A -122 N/A N/A +105 +130  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-125 -135 -145 -154 N/A -104 N/A N/A -137 -155  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+3 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -135 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +3 -115  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-3 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +114 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -3 -105  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
o46.5 -110 N/A N/A o24.5 even N/A N/A o23.5 -125 N/A N/A o48.5 -112  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
u46.5 -110 N/A N/A u24.5 -120 N/A N/A u23.5 even N/A N/A u48.5 -108  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+105 N/A N/A -102 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +130  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-125 N/A N/A -118 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -155  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+3 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -135 N/A +1.5 -138 +0.5 -140 N/A N/A +3 -115  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-3 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +105 N/A -1.5 +104 -0.5 +110 N/A N/A -3 -105  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
o46.5 -110 o13 -110 N/A o13.5 even N/A o16.5 -122 o13.5 -115 N/A N/A o48.5 -112  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
u46.5 -110 u13 -110 N/A u13.5 -130 N/A u16.5 -106 u13.5 -110 N/A N/A u48.5 -108  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+105 +110 N/A even N/A +114 N/A N/A N/A +130  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-125 -130 N/A -130 N/A -142 N/A N/A N/A -155  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+3 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -160 N/A +1.5 -136 +0.5 -155 N/A N/A +3 -115  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-3 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +124 N/A -1.5 +102 -0.5 +120 N/A N/A -3 -105  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
o46.5 -110 o10.5 -110 N/A o9.5 -135 N/A o7.5 +245 o9.5 -140 N/A N/A o48.5 -112  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
u46.5 -110 u10.5 -110 N/A u9.5 +105 N/A u7.5 -360 u9.5 +110 N/A N/A u48.5 -108  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+105 +105 N/A even N/A +140 N/A N/A N/A +130  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-125 -125 N/A -130 N/A -180 N/A N/A N/A -155  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+3 -110 +0.5 -140 N/A -0.5 +110 N/A +1.5 -160 +0.5 -160 N/A N/A +3 -115  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-3 -110 -0.5 +120 N/A +0.5 -140 N/A -1.5 +120 -0.5 +125 N/A N/A -3 -105  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
o46.5 -110 o13.5 -110 N/A o13.5 -125 N/A o13.5 -100 o13.5 -125 N/A N/A o48.5 -112  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
u46.5 -110 u13.5 -110 N/A u13.5 -105 N/A u13.5 -124 u13.5 even N/A N/A u48.5 -108  
Final
Kent State Golden Flashes 105 Kent State
+105 even N/A -125 N/A +106 N/A N/A N/A +130  
Ball State Cardinals 106 Ball State
-125 -120 N/A -105 N/A -136 N/A N/A N/A -155  

This total is too high for two teams that play so slow. Kent State averages 61.1 offensive snaps per game, while Ball State is averaging 63.3 offensive snaps per game.

Both teams have limited explosives on offense, and Ball State, specifically, has less than a 1% big-time throw rate. Consequently, their explosive-play rate is in the 2nd percentile amongst all other college football teams. Wednesday's MACtion should bring us a low-scoring matchup.

Bet: Kent State Golden Flashes @ Ball State Cardinals u46.5 (-110)

JAMES MADISON VS. MARSHALL BEST BET

JMU @ MRSH Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-12.5 -110 -7 -110 -6.5 -140 -7.5 +105 -7.5 -103 -7.5 -106 -7.5 -105 -7.5 +105 -7.5 -103 -13.5 -112  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+12.5 -110 +7 -110 +6.5 +105 +7.5 -125 +7.5 -121 +7.5 -114 +7.5 -125 +7.5 -125 +7.5 -121 +13.5 -108  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
o54.5 -110 o27.5 -110 o27.5 even o26.5 -120 o26.5 -127 o27.5 -114 o27.5 -110 o27.5 +105 o27.5 -114 o53.5 -112  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
u54.5 -110 u27.5 -110 u27.5 -120 u26.5 even u26.5 even u27.5 -106 u27.5 -120 u27.5 -125 u27.5 -113 u53.5 -108  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-440 -350 -325 -375 -390 -420 N/A N/A -360 -550  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+340 +275 +260 +300 +285 +310 N/A N/A +265 +410  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-12.5 -110 -3.5 -110 -3.5 -105 -3.5 -105 N/A -3.5 -116 -3.5 -105 -3.5 -110 -3.5 -115 -13.5 -112  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+12.5 -110 +3.5 -120 +3.5 -120 +3.5 -125 N/A +3.5 -108 +3.5 -125 +3.5 -120 +3.5 -117 +13.5 -108  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
o54.5 -110 o13 -105 o12.5 -105 o10.5 -115 N/A o12.5 -120 o12.5 -115 o10.5 -110 o12.5 -118 o53.5 -112  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
u54.5 -110 u13 -125 u12.5 -115 u10.5 -115 N/A u12.5 -104 u12.5 -115 u10.5 -120 u12.5 -112 u53.5 -108  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-440 -240 -250 -245 N/A -310 N/A N/A -278 -550  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+340 +190 +190 +185 N/A +220 N/A N/A +205 +410  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-12.5 -110 N/A N/A -6.5 -115 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -13.5 -112  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+12.5 -110 N/A N/A +6.5 -105 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +13.5 -108  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
o54.5 -110 N/A N/A o26.5 -118 N/A N/A o26.5 -110 N/A N/A o53.5 -112  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
u54.5 -110 N/A N/A u26.5 -102 N/A N/A u26.5 -115 N/A N/A u53.5 -108  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-440 N/A N/A -345 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -550  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+340 N/A N/A +270 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +410  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-12.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 -130 N/A -4.5 -100 -3.5 -115 N/A N/A -13.5 -112  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+12.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 even N/A +4.5 -132 +3.5 -110 N/A N/A +13.5 -108  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
o54.5 -110 o14.5 -105 N/A o14.5 even N/A o22.5 -168 o14.5 -105 N/A N/A o53.5 -112  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
u54.5 -110 u14.5 -115 N/A u14.5 -130 N/A u22.5 +128 u14.5 -120 N/A N/A u53.5 -108  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-440 -275 N/A -298 N/A -320 N/A N/A N/A -550  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+340 +230 N/A +230 N/A +240 N/A N/A N/A +410  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-12.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 -120 N/A -3.5 -108 -3.5 -110 N/A N/A -13.5 -112  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+12.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -110 N/A +3.5 -122 +3.5 -115 N/A N/A +13.5 -108  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
o54.5 -110 o13 -110 N/A o12.5 -125 N/A o9.5 -130 o10.5 -120 N/A N/A o53.5 -112  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
u54.5 -110 u13 -110 N/A u12.5 -105 N/A u9.5 -100 u10.5 -105 N/A N/A u53.5 -108  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-440 -230 N/A -280 N/A -290 N/A N/A N/A -550  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+340 +190 N/A +210 N/A +215 N/A N/A N/A +410  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-12.5 -110 -1 -110 N/A -1.5 -115 N/A -2.5 -118 -1.5 -115 N/A N/A -13.5 -112  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+12.5 -110 +1 -110 N/A +1.5 -115 N/A +2.5 -112 +1.5 -115 N/A N/A +13.5 -108  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
o54.5 -110 o14 -110 N/A o14.5 +114 N/A o13.5 -124 o13.5 -135 N/A N/A o53.5 -112  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
u54.5 -110 u14 -110 N/A u14.5 -145 N/A u13.5 -100 u13.5 +105 N/A N/A u53.5 -108  
Final
James Madison Dukes 129 James Madison
-440 -190 N/A -195 N/A -235 N/A N/A N/A -550  
Marshall Thundering Herd 130 Marshall
+340 +155 N/A +150 N/A +186 N/A N/A N/A +410  

Both of these teams have played easy schedules to date, but James Madison has the stats, while Marshall does not. JMU ranks 10th in Net EPA/play and is particularly stout on defense.

JMU's defense is 2nd in defensive success rate and 7th in EPA/pass attempt allowed. Marshall's rush defense is the best part of their defensive unit, but JMU quarterback Alonza Barnett III is more than capable to attack this Marshall pass defense.

Bet: James Madison Dukes -12.5 (-110)

TEMPLE VS. ARMY BEST BET

TEM @ ARMY Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+6.5 -110 +3.5 even +3.5 -105 +3.5 even +3.5 -103 +3.5 -105 +4.5 -120 +4.5 -120 +4.5 -112 +7 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-6.5 -110 -3.5 -120 -3.5 -115 -3.5 -120 -3.5 -121 -3.5 -114 -4.5 -110 -4.5 even -4.5 -112 -7 -115  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
o47.5 -110 o22.5 -115 o22.5 -115 o21.5 -110 o21.5 -117 o23.5 -102 o23.5 -120 o22.5 -110 o23.5 -104 o45.5 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
u47.5 -110 u22.5 -105 u22.5 -105 u21.5 -110 u21.5 -106 u23.5 -122 u23.5 -110 u22.5 -110 u23.5 -125 u45.5 -115  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+180 +190 +180 +195 +190 +168 N/A N/A +190 +235  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-218 -230 -220 -238 -245 -215 N/A N/A -265 -278  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+6.5 -110 +0.5 even +3.5 -135 +2.5 -115 N/A +1.5 -124 +0.5 -120 +2.5 -105 +2.5 -107 +7 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-6.5 -110 -0.5 -130 -3.5 even -2.5 -115 N/A -1.5 -100 -0.5 -110 -2.5 -125 -2.5 -122 -7 -115  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
o47.5 -110 o9.5 -125 o9.5 -125 o9.5 -115 N/A o9.5 -120 o9.5 -135 o10.5 +135 o9.5 -136 o45.5 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
u47.5 -110 u9.5 -105 u9.5 -105 u9.5 -115 N/A u9.5 -104 u9.5 +105 u10.5 -185 u9.5 +105 u45.5 -115  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+180 +175 +175 +160 N/A +138 N/A N/A +185 +235  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-218 -225 -235 -210 N/A -178 N/A N/A -250 -278  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -115 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +7 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 -105 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -7 -115  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
o47.5 -110 N/A N/A o22.5 -115 N/A N/A o22.5 -110 N/A N/A o45.5 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
u47.5 -110 N/A N/A u22.5 -105 N/A N/A u22.5 -115 N/A N/A u45.5 -115  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+180 N/A N/A +170 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +235  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-218 N/A N/A -198 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -278  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -120 N/A +2.5 -118 +0.5 -130 N/A N/A +7 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -110 N/A -2.5 -110 -0.5 even N/A N/A -7 -115  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
o47.5 -110 o13.5 -110 N/A o12.5 -125 N/A o17.5 +136 o10.5 -120 N/A N/A o45.5 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
u47.5 -110 u13.5 -110 N/A u12.5 -105 N/A u17.5 -174 u10.5 -105 N/A N/A u45.5 -115  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+180 +135 N/A +145 N/A +142 N/A N/A N/A +235  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-218 -160 N/A -188 N/A -186 N/A N/A N/A -278  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -120 N/A +1.5 -136 +0.5 -115 N/A N/A +7 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -110 N/A -1.5 +102 -0.5 -110 N/A N/A -7 -115  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
o47.5 -110 o10 -110 N/A o9.5 -120 N/A o9.5 -118 o9.5 -115 N/A N/A o45.5 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
u47.5 -110 u10 -110 N/A u9.5 -110 N/A u9.5 -110 u9.5 -110 N/A N/A u45.5 -115  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+180 +165 N/A +140 N/A +144 N/A N/A N/A +235  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-218 -200 N/A -175 N/A -184 N/A N/A N/A -278  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+6.5 -110 +0.5 -120 N/A +1.5 -120 N/A +1.5 -132 +0.5 -125 N/A N/A +7 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-6.5 -110 -0.5 even N/A -1.5 -110 N/A -1.5 -100 -0.5 -105 N/A N/A -7 -115  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
o47.5 -110 o10.5 -110 N/A o13.5 -115 N/A o11.5 -114 o13.5 -105 N/A N/A o45.5 -105  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
u47.5 -110 u10.5 -110 N/A u13.5 -115 N/A u11.5 -110 u13.5 -125 N/A N/A u45.5 -115  
Final
Temple Owls 127 Temple
+180 +150 N/A +140 N/A +136 N/A N/A N/A +235  
Army Black Knights 128 Army
-218 -180 N/A -180 N/A -172 N/A N/A N/A -278  

I like Temple's offensive matchup in the pass game here. They currently rank 12th in EPA/pass attempt, while Army's defense is 97th against the pass. Temple's offense is very strong on early downs, while Army's late-down success rate allowed is one of the worst in college football.

Conversely, Temple's defense is strong on 3rd down, allowing a 40.6% 3rd-down success rate. I like Temple to win this game against Army.

Bet: Temple Owls +6.5 (-105) + ML (+205)

EASTERN MICHIGAN VS. BOWLING GREEN BEST BET

BGSU @ EMU Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+1.5 -110 +1 -110 +1.5 -105 +1.5 -110 +1.5 -117 +1.5 -112 +0.5 -115 +5.5 -110 +1.5 -127 +3 -108  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-1.5 -110 -1 -110 -1.5 -115 -1.5 -110 -1.5 -106 -1.5 -108 -0.5 -120 -5.5 -120 -1.5 +102 -3 -112  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
o51.5 -110 o24 -105 o24.5 even o23.5 -125 o24.5 even o24.5 -100 o24.5 -105 o24.5 -110 o24.5 even o49.5 -108  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
u51.5 -110 u24 -115 u24.5 -120 u23.5 +105 u24.5 -124 u24.5 -122 u24.5 -125 u24.5 -120 u24.5 -130 u49.5 -112  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+102 +120 +115 +120 +110 +120 N/A N/A -103 +136  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-122 -140 -140 -142 -137 -148 N/A N/A -129 -162  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+1.5 -110 +0.5 -145 +0.5 -140 +0.5 -135 N/A +1.5 -142 +0.5 -175 +3.5 -105 +1.5 -175 +3 -108  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-1.5 -110 -0.5 +115 -0.5 +110 -0.5 +105 N/A -1.5 +114 -0.5 +135 -3.5 -125 -1.5 +130 -3 -112  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
o51.5 -110 o10.5 -105 o10.5 even o10.5 +110 N/A o10.5 +114 o9.5 -140 o12.5 -120 o10.5 +112 o49.5 -108  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
u51.5 -110 u10.5 -125 u10.5 -125 u10.5 -140 N/A u10.5 -145 u9.5 +110 u12.5 -110 u10.5 -143 u49.5 -112  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+102 even +110 +114 N/A +122 N/A N/A -117 +136  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-122 -130 -145 -145 N/A -156 N/A N/A -113 -162  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -125 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +3 -108  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +105 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -3 -112  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
o51.5 -110 N/A N/A o24.5 +102 N/A N/A o23.5 -130 N/A N/A o49.5 -108  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
u51.5 -110 N/A N/A u24.5 -122 N/A N/A u23.5 even N/A N/A u49.5 -112  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+102 N/A N/A +105 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +136  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-122 N/A N/A -125 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -162  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -135 N/A +1.5 -144 +0.5 -140 N/A N/A +3 -108  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +105 N/A -1.5 +108 -0.5 +110 N/A N/A -3 -112  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
o51.5 -110 o14 -105 N/A o13.5 -115 N/A o6.5 -110 o13.5 -115 N/A N/A o49.5 -108  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
u51.5 -110 u14 -115 N/A u13.5 -115 N/A u6.5 -120 u13.5 -110 N/A N/A u49.5 -112  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+102 +105 N/A -105 N/A +108 N/A N/A N/A +136  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-122 -125 N/A -125 N/A -136 N/A N/A N/A -162  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -160 N/A +1.5 -180 +0.5 -155 N/A N/A +3 -108  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +124 N/A -1.5 +134 -0.5 +120 N/A N/A -3 -112  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
o51.5 -110 o12 -110 N/A o10.5 +114 N/A o8.5 -110 o9.5 -140 N/A N/A o49.5 -108  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
u51.5 -110 u12 -110 N/A u10.5 -145 N/A u8.5 -118 u9.5 +110 N/A N/A u49.5 -112  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+102 even N/A even N/A -102 N/A N/A N/A +136  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-122 -120 N/A -130 N/A -125 N/A N/A N/A -162  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+1.5 -110 +0.5 -155 N/A +0.5 -140 N/A +1.5 -178 +0.5 -160 N/A N/A +3 -108  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-1.5 -110 -0.5 +130 N/A -0.5 +110 N/A -1.5 +130 -0.5 +125 N/A N/A -3 -112  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
o51.5 -110 o13.5 -115 N/A o13.5 -125 N/A o13.5 +102 o13.5 -125 N/A N/A o49.5 -108  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
u51.5 -110 u13.5 -105 N/A u13.5 -105 N/A u13.5 -128 u13.5 even N/A N/A u49.5 -112  
Final
Bowling Green Falcons 153 Bowling Green
+102 even N/A -105 N/A -102 N/A N/A N/A +136  
Eastern Michigan Eagles 154 Eastern Michigan
-122 -120 N/A -125 N/A -125 N/A N/A N/A -162  

Eastern Michigan's offense is rather efficient for a MAC team. They rank 46th in EPA/pass and 52nd in EPA/rush. The Eastern Michigan offense will be what makes them victorious in this MAC matchup.

The advantage for EMU is in the air, and their identity so far has been through the air. EMU has passed the ball on 55.6% of offensive snaps, so not only is the matchup advantageous, but they like to play to this particular matchup strength as it is.

Bet: Eastern Michigan Eagles -1.5 (-115)

JACKSONVILLE STATE VS. UTEP BEST BET

JVST @ UTEP Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-1.5 -110 -0.5 even -0.5 -102 +0.5 -125 +1.5 -143 -1.5 +114 -0.5 +105 -0.5 +105 +1.5 -127 -1.5 -115  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+1.5 -110 +0.5 -120 +0.5 -118 -0.5 -105 -1.5 +115 +1.5 -140 +0.5 -130 +0.5 -125 -1.5 +102 +1.5 -115  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
o48.5 -115 o23.5 -105 o23.5 -110 o23.5 -120 o23.5 -112 o23.5 -112 o23.5 -110 o23.5 -110 o23.5 -106 o46.5 -120  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
u48.5 -105 u23.5 -115 u23.5 -110 u23.5 -108 u23.5 -110 u23.5 -106 u23.5 -110 u23.5 -110 u23.5 -124 u46.5 -108  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-130 -115 -118 -115 -108 -115 N/A N/A even -125  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+110 -105 -102 -115 -114 -105 N/A N/A -129 -105  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-1.5 -110 -0.5 +130 +0.5 -160 +0.5 -154 N/A -1.5 +146 -0.5 +125 -0.5 +130 +1.5 -155 -1.5 -115  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+1.5 -110 +0.5 -160 -0.5 +125 -0.5 +120 N/A +1.5 -184 +0.5 -155 +0.5 -180 -1.5 +118 +1.5 -115  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
o48.5 -115 o10 -110 o10.5 +120 o9.5 -135 N/A o9.5 -140 o9.5 -130 o10.5 +125 o9.5 -118 o46.5 -120  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
u48.5 -105 u10 -120 u10.5 -155 u9.5 +105 N/A u9.5 +110 u9.5 +105 u10.5 -170 u9.5 -109 u46.5 -108  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-130 -115 -105 -105 N/A -113 N/A N/A +108 -125  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+110 -115 -120 -125 N/A -113 N/A N/A -139 -105  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +105 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -115  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -135 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -115  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
o48.5 -115 N/A N/A o22.5 -115 N/A N/A o21.5 -115 N/A N/A o46.5 -120  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
u48.5 -105 N/A N/A u22.5 -115 N/A N/A u21.5 -110 N/A N/A u46.5 -108  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-130 N/A N/A -130 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -125  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+110 N/A N/A even N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -105  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +115 N/A -1.5 +122 +0.5 -145 N/A N/A -1.5 -115  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -148 N/A +1.5 -166 -0.5 +115 N/A N/A +1.5 -115  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
o48.5 -115 o13.5 -110 N/A o13.5 -105 N/A o13.5 -110 o13.5 -105 N/A N/A o46.5 -120  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
u48.5 -105 u13.5 -110 N/A u13.5 -125 N/A u13.5 -122 u13.5 -120 N/A N/A u46.5 -108  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-130 -110 N/A -115 N/A -113 N/A N/A N/A -125  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+110 -110 N/A -115 N/A -113 N/A N/A N/A -105  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-1.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +115 N/A -1.5 +142 +0.5 -170 N/A N/A -1.5 -115  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+1.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -148 N/A +1.5 -192 -0.5 +135 N/A N/A +1.5 -115  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
o48.5 -115 o10.5 -105 N/A o9.5 -125 N/A o8.5 +126 o9.5 -125 N/A N/A o46.5 -120  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
u48.5 -105 u10.5 -115 N/A u9.5 -105 N/A u8.5 -172 u9.5 even N/A N/A u46.5 -108  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-130 -110 N/A -142 N/A -113 N/A N/A N/A -125  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+110 -110 N/A +110 N/A -113 N/A N/A N/A -105  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-1.5 -110 +0.5 -170 N/A +0.5 -148 N/A -1.5 +128 +0.5 -170 N/A N/A -1.5 -115  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+1.5 -110 -0.5 +145 N/A -0.5 +115 N/A +1.5 -172 -0.5 +130 N/A N/A +1.5 -115  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
o48.5 -115 o13 -110 N/A o12.5 -125 N/A o12.5 -116 o10.5 -115 N/A N/A o46.5 -120  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
u48.5 -105 u13 -110 N/A u12.5 -105 N/A u12.5 -108 u10.5 -110 N/A N/A u46.5 -108  
Final
Jacksonville State Gamecocks 185 Jacksonville State
-130 -110 N/A -115 N/A -128 N/A N/A N/A -125  
UTEP Miners 186 UTEP
+110 -110 N/A -115 N/A -100 N/A N/A N/A -105  

UTEP is coming into this matchup with one of the better defenses in college football. They rank 9th in defensive success rate, with a particular strength against the run. Although their defense is so strong, it evens out with their abysmal offense.

UTEP is 131st in both pass and rush offense, 133rd in early downs EPA/play, and 133rd in 3rd-down success rate. UTEP is going to stop Jacksonville State but likely won't be able to capitalize on their stops, which should result in a low-scoring affair.

Bet: Jacksonville State Gamecocks @ UTEP Miners u49.5 (-110)

TEXAS A&M VS. MISSOURI BEST BET

TA&M @ MIZ Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-6.5 -110 -3.5 -110 -3.5 -120 -3.5 -125 -3.5 -110 -3.5 -108 -3.5 -125 -3.5 -105 -4.5 -110 -6.5 -120  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+6.5 -110 +3.5 -110 +3.5 even +3.5 -105 +3.5 -110 +3.5 -112 +3.5 -105 +3.5 -115 +4.5 -113 +6.5 -110  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
o49.5 -110 o24 -110 o23.5 -120 o26.5 -115 o24 -105 o24.5 +114 o24.5 even o22.5 -140 o24.5 -106 o47.5 -115  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
u49.5 -110 u24 -110 u23.5 even u26.5 -115 u24 -115 u24.5 -140 u24.5 -130 u22.5 +115 u24.5 -125 u47.5 -115  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-218 -205 -220 -225 -205 -200 N/A N/A -235 -258  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+180 +170 +180 +170 +170 +160 N/A N/A +175 +200  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-6.5 -110 -0.5 -120 -0.5 -115 -2.5 -120 -0.5 -115 -1.5 +104 -0.5 -110 -0.5 -105 -1.5 -118 -6.5 -120  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+6.5 -110 +0.5 -110 +0.5 -110 +2.5 -110 +0.5 -115 +1.5 -132 +0.5 -120 +0.5 -125 +1.5 -112 +6.5 -110  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
o49.5 -110 o10 -120 o10.5 even o10.5 -110 o10 -125 o9.5 -152 o10.5 +110 o10.5 +120 o10.5 +112 o47.5 -115  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
u49.5 -110 u10 -110 u10.5 -130 u10.5 -120 u10 -105 u9.5 +120 u10.5 -140 u10.5 -165 u10.5 -143 u47.5 -115  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-218 -180 -190 -188 -170 -172 N/A N/A -215 -258  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+180 +145 +145 +145 +140 +136 N/A N/A +163 +200  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -125 -2.5 -120 N/A N/A N/A N/A -6.5 -120  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -105 +2.5 even N/A N/A N/A N/A +6.5 -110  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
o49.5 -110 N/A N/A o20.5 -125 o23.5 -120 N/A o23.5 -125 N/A N/A o47.5 -115  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
u49.5 -110 N/A N/A u20.5 -105 u23.5 even N/A u23.5 -105 N/A N/A u47.5 -115  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-218 N/A N/A -188 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -258  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+180 N/A N/A +145 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +200  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -110 N/A -2.5 -118 -0.5 -115 N/A N/A -6.5 -120  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -120 N/A +2.5 -112 +0.5 -115 N/A N/A +6.5 -110  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
o49.5 -110 o13.5 -115 N/A o13.5 -135 N/A o5.5 -118 o12.5 -135 N/A N/A o47.5 -115  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
u49.5 -110 u13.5 -105 N/A u13.5 +105 N/A u5.5 -110 u12.5 +105 N/A N/A u47.5 -115  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-218 -165 N/A -154 N/A -188 N/A N/A N/A -258  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+180 +140 N/A +120 N/A +146 N/A N/A N/A +200  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-6.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +110 N/A -1.5 -112 -0.5 -110 N/A N/A -6.5 -120  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+6.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -142 N/A +1.5 -118 +0.5 -120 N/A N/A +6.5 -110  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
o49.5 -110 o10 -120 N/A o7.5 -115 N/A o20.5 -114 o9.5 -140 N/A N/A o47.5 -115  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
u49.5 -110 u10 even N/A u7.5 -115 N/A u20.5 -114 u9.5 +110 N/A N/A u47.5 -115  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-218 -190 N/A -148 N/A -200 N/A N/A N/A -258  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+180 +160 N/A +115 N/A +154 N/A N/A N/A +200  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-6.5 -110 -0.5 -105 N/A -0.5 -120 N/A -1.5 -102 -0.5 even N/A N/A -6.5 -120  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+6.5 -110 +0.5 -115 N/A +0.5 -110 N/A +1.5 -130 +0.5 -130 N/A N/A +6.5 -110  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
o49.5 -110 o13 -110 N/A o11.5 -115 N/A o12.5 -118 o13.5 -120 N/A N/A o47.5 -115  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
u49.5 -110 u13 -110 N/A u11.5 -115 N/A u12.5 -106 u13.5 -110 N/A N/A u47.5 -115  
Final
Texas A&M Aggies 163 Texas A&M
-218 -165 N/A -175 N/A -162 N/A N/A N/A -258  
Missouri Tigers 164 Missouri
+180 +140 N/A +135 N/A +128 N/A N/A N/A +200  

This Texas A&M offense is one of the most fun offenses to watch in college football. With a near 5% big-time throw rate, quarterback Marcel Reed has solidified his name amongst the top of the Heisman favorites.

With that said, Missouri plays fast and can capitalize on a Texas A&M defense that has allowed 21+ points in over half of their games this season. Even with Beau Pribula out for the season, Missouri should still be able to expose the 95th-ranked Texas A&M rush defense.

Check out my complete Texas A&M vs. Missouri preview.

Sports betting is coming to Missouri! Download the Draftkings Missouri app today by clicking the banner below!

Updated on 11/15/25

DraftKings
Bet $5 (when we go live on 12/1) Get $300 in Bonus Bets!
Bonus Code
No Code Needed
Download App!
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. 21+. Physically present in Missouri. Eligibility restrictions apply. Subject to regulatory licensing requirements. Register for a Missouri online sports wagering account starting 11/17.1 per new customer. $5+ first-time bet when we go live on 12/1 req. Excludes customers who redeem prelaunch signup offer. Max. $300 issued as non-withdrawable Bonus Bets that expire in 7 days (168 hours). Stake removed from payout. Terms: sportsbook.draftkings.com/promos. Ends 1/4/26 at 11:59 PM ET. Sponsored by DK.

Best Bet: Texas A&M Aggies @ Missouri Tigers o49.5 (-105)

DUKE VS. UCONN BEST BET

DUKE @ UCONN Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-10.5 -110 -4.5 -110 -4.5 -105 -3.5 -115 -4.5 -114 -5.5 -105 -4.5 -105 -4.5 -105 -3.5 -120 -7.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+10.5 -110 +4.5 -110 +4.5 -115 +3.5 -115 +4.5 -108 +5.5 -115 +4.5 -125 +4.5 -115 +3.5 -104 +7.5 -115  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
o64.5 -118 o31.5 -110 o31.5 -102 o32.5 -120 o32 -107 o32.5 -104 o31.5 -110 o31.5 -105 o31.5 -108 o62.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
u64.5 -102 u31.5 -110 u31.5 -118 u32.5 -110 u32 -115 u32.5 -118 u31.5 -120 u31.5 -125 u31.5 -120 u62.5 -115  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-310 -225 -225 -198 -240 -225 N/A N/A -225 -310  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+250 +185 +185 +150 +185 +180 N/A N/A +165 +220  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-10.5 -110 -3 -120 -2.5 -115 -0.5 +105 N/A -2.5 -116 -2.5 -125 -3.5 +105 -2.5 -113 -7.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+10.5 -110 +3 -110 +2.5 -115 +0.5 -135 N/A +2.5 -108 +2.5 even +3.5 -140 +2.5 -115 +7.5 -115  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
o64.5 -118 o14 -115 o13.5 -165 o13.5 -154 N/A o13.5 -160 o13.5 -140 o14.5 +150 o13.5 -139 o62.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
u64.5 -102 u14 -115 u13.5 +125 u13.5 +120 N/A u13.5 +124 u13.5 +110 u14.5 -210 u13.5 +108 u62.5 -115  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-310 -200 -185 -135 N/A -215 N/A N/A -186 -310  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+250 +160 +140 +105 N/A +162 N/A N/A +143 +220  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A -5.5 -115 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -7.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A +5.5 -115 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +7.5 -115  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
o64.5 -118 N/A N/A o29.5 -110 N/A N/A o30.5 -125 N/A N/A o62.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
u64.5 -102 N/A N/A u29.5 -120 N/A N/A u30.5 -105 N/A N/A u62.5 -115  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-310 N/A N/A -270 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -310  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+250 N/A N/A +200 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +220  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -125 N/A -3.5 -100 -2.5 -120 N/A N/A -7.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -105 N/A +3.5 -132 +2.5 -105 N/A N/A +7.5 -115  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
o64.5 -118 o17.5 -110 N/A o17.5 -115 N/A o21.5 +134 o17.5 +105 N/A N/A o62.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
u64.5 -102 u17.5 -110 N/A u17.5 -115 N/A u21.5 -178 u17.5 -135 N/A N/A u62.5 -115  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-310 -180 N/A -204 N/A -225 N/A N/A N/A -310  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+250 +150 N/A +155 N/A +172 N/A N/A N/A +220  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 -120 N/A -2.5 -114 -2.5 -115 N/A N/A -7.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -110 N/A +2.5 -114 +2.5 -110 N/A N/A +7.5 -115  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
o64.5 -118 o14 -105 N/A o13.5 -135 N/A o16.5 -156 o13.5 -145 N/A N/A o62.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
u64.5 -102 u14 -115 N/A u13.5 +105 N/A u16.5 +120 u13.5 +115 N/A N/A u62.5 -115  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-310 -185 N/A -300 N/A -194 N/A N/A N/A -310  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+250 +150 N/A +220 N/A +152 N/A N/A N/A +220  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-10.5 -110 -0.5 even N/A -0.5 -120 N/A -1.5 -108 -0.5 -110 N/A N/A -7.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+10.5 -110 +0.5 -120 N/A +0.5 -110 N/A +1.5 -122 +0.5 -120 N/A N/A +7.5 -115  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
o64.5 -118 o17 -110 N/A o14.5 -120 N/A o14.5 -116 o16.5 -120 N/A N/A o62.5 -115  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
u64.5 -102 u17 -110 N/A u14.5 -110 N/A u14.5 -108 u16.5 -110 N/A N/A u62.5 -115  
Final
Duke Blue Devils 191 Duke
-310 -150 N/A -162 N/A -174 N/A N/A N/A -310  
UConn Huskies 192 UConn
+250 +125 N/A +126 N/A +140 N/A N/A N/A +220  

This Duke offense is FUN. Darian Mensah has one of the highest PFF grades amongst college quarterbacks, and the near 5% big-time throw rate is very strong. Duke also loves to pass the ball, as they have run passing plays on 61.3% of offensive snaps.

Conversely, Duke's defense is weak enough to give UConn a path to the end zone. UConn's pass offense is 10th, while Duke's pass defense is 113th. While neither team plays fast, I think they will both be efficient enough to make this a high-scoring affair.

Best Bet: Duke Blue Devils @ UConn Huskies o65.5 (-110)

TEXAS STATE VS. LOUISIANA BEST BET

TXST @ UL Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-3 -110 -2 -110 -2.5 -110 -4.5 -105 -2.5 -121 -3.5 -114 -3.5 -105 +0.5 -140 -3.5 -124 -3.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+3 -110 +2 -110 +2.5 -110 +4.5 -125 +2.5 -103 +3.5 -106 +3.5 -125 -0.5 +105 +3.5 -121 +3.5 -120  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
o64.5 -115 o31 -105 o31.5 +105 o31.5 -110 o31.5 -108 o32.5 -104 o30.5 -115 o27.5 -125 o31.5 -113 o63.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
u64.5 -105 u31 -115 u31.5 -125 u31.5 -120 u31.5 -115 u32.5 -115 u30.5 -115 u27.5 -105 u31.5 -115 u63.5 -120  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-142 -150 -145 -204 -157 -184 N/A N/A -190 -175  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+120 +125 +120 +155 +125 +148 N/A N/A +143 +140  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-3 -110 -0.5 +105 -0.5 even -3.5 -115 -0.5 +105 -2.5 -116 -0.5 -110 -0.5 +150 -2.5 -134 -3.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+3 -110 +0.5 -135 +0.5 -130 +3.5 -115 +0.5 -135 +2.5 -108 +0.5 -120 +0.5 -210 +2.5 -117 +3.5 -120  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
o64.5 -115 o14 -110 o13.5 -165 o13.5 -162 o13.5 -160 o13.5 -164 o13.5 -115 o10.5 +105 o13.5 -159 o63.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
u64.5 -105 u14 -120 u13.5 +125 u13.5 +126 u13.5 +130 u13.5 +134 u13.5 -115 u10.5 -140 u13.5 +120 u63.5 -120  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-142 -130 -150 -234 -130 -210 N/A N/A -210 -175  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+120 even +115 +176 even +162 N/A N/A +160 +140  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-3 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -142 -0.5 +105 N/A N/A N/A N/A -3.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+3 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +110 +0.5 -125 N/A N/A N/A N/A +3.5 -120  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
o64.5 -115 N/A N/A o30.5 -118 o33.5 -110 N/A o31.5 -105 N/A N/A o63.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
u64.5 -105 N/A N/A u30.5 -110 u33.5 -110 N/A u31.5 -125 N/A N/A u63.5 -120  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-142 N/A N/A even N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -175  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+120 N/A N/A -130 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +140  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-3 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +114 N/A -1.5 +102 -0.5 -105 N/A N/A -3.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+3 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -145 N/A +1.5 -138 +0.5 -120 N/A N/A +3.5 -120  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
o64.5 -115 o17 -110 N/A o17.5 +110 N/A o34.5 -148 o16.5 -140 N/A N/A o63.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
u64.5 -105 u17 -110 N/A u17.5 -140 N/A u34.5 +112 u16.5 +110 N/A N/A u63.5 -120  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-142 -130 N/A -120 N/A -150 N/A N/A N/A -175  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+120 +110 N/A -110 N/A +118 N/A N/A N/A +140  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-3 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -142 N/A +1.5 -182 -0.5 +105 N/A N/A -3.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+3 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +110 N/A -1.5 +136 +0.5 -135 N/A N/A +3.5 -120  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
o64.5 -115 o14 -125 N/A o13.5 -154 N/A o14.5 -110 o13.5 -150 N/A N/A o63.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
u64.5 -105 u14 +105 N/A u13.5 +120 N/A u14.5 -122 u13.5 +115 N/A N/A u63.5 -120  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-142 -125 N/A +110 N/A -111 N/A N/A N/A -175  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+120 +105 N/A -142 N/A -115 N/A N/A N/A +140  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-3 -110 -0.5 +120 N/A -0.5 +110 N/A -1.5 +122 -0.5 +110 N/A N/A -3.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+3 -110 +0.5 -140 N/A +0.5 -142 N/A +1.5 -166 +0.5 -145 N/A N/A +3.5 -120  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
o64.5 -115 o17 -110 N/A o16.5 -120 N/A o15.5 -114 o16.5 -125 N/A N/A o63.5 -110  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
u64.5 -105 u17 -110 N/A u16.5 -110 N/A u15.5 -110 u16.5 even N/A N/A u63.5 -120  
Final
Texas State Bobcats 171 Texas State
-142 -120 N/A -120 N/A -130 N/A N/A N/A -175  
Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns 172 Louisiana
+120 even N/A -110 N/A -100 N/A N/A N/A +140  

The statistical discrepancy between these two teams is far too wide to rationalize this short of a betting line. Normally, I can adjust the stats for strength of schedule, but according to PFF, Texas State has played a tougher schedule to date than Louisiana.

Offensively, Texas State has an advantage in both the air and ground. Louisiana's defense is 108th in defensive success rate and 124th in net EPA/drive.

Take Texas State before this gets to 3.5 or higher.

Best Bet: Texas State Bobcats -2.5 (-105)

AIR FORCE VS. SAN JOSE STATE BEST BET

AFA @ SJSU Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+2.5 -110 +3 +105 +3.5 -105 +3.5 -110 +3.5 -108 +4.5 -114 +3.5 -110 +7.5 -115 +1.5 -110 +6 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-2.5 -110 -3 -125 -3.5 -115 -3.5 -110 -3.5 -114 -4.5 -104 -3.5 -120 -7.5 -115 -1.5 -113 -6 -112  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
o65.5 -108 o34 -110 o33.5 -118 o34.5 -105 o33.5 -120 o34.5 -106 o33.5 -125 o34.5 -120 o33.5 -122 o68.5 -105  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
u65.5 -112 u34 -110 u33.5 -102 u34.5 -115 u33.5 even u34.5 -114 u33.5 -105 u34.5 -110 u33.5 -107 u68.5 -115  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+145 +160 +145 +160 +150 +176 N/A N/A +112 +195  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-175 -190 -175 -185 -190 -225 N/A N/A -148 -245  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+2.5 -110 +0.5 even +2.5 -105 +2.5 -110 N/A +2.5 -108 +1.5 -115 +3.5 -105 +1.5 -152 +6 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-2.5 -110 -0.5 -130 -2.5 -120 -2.5 -120 N/A -2.5 -116 -1.5 -110 -3.5 -125 -1.5 +120 -6 -112  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
o65.5 -108 o14 -115 o14.5 +120 o13.5 -175 N/A o14.5 +120 o14.5 +110 o14.5 -105 o13.5 -157 o68.5 -105  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
u65.5 -112 u14 -115 u14.5 -155 u13.5 +135 N/A u14.5 -148 u14.5 -135 u14.5 -125 u13.5 +120 u68.5 -115  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+145 +140 +154 +145 N/A +164 N/A N/A even +195  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-175 -170 -200 -188 N/A -220 N/A N/A -129 -245  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -102 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +6 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -118 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -6 -112  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
o65.5 -108 N/A N/A o33.5 -115 N/A N/A o33.5 -120 N/A N/A o68.5 -105  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
u65.5 -112 N/A N/A u33.5 -105 N/A N/A u33.5 -105 N/A N/A u68.5 -115  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+145 N/A N/A +154 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +195  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-175 N/A N/A -185 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -245  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -130 N/A +1.5 -114 +1.5 -115 N/A N/A +6 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 even N/A -1.5 -110 -1.5 -110 N/A N/A -6 -112  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
o65.5 -108 o19.5 -110 N/A o20.5 -110 N/A o20.5 -180 o19.5 -115 N/A N/A o68.5 -105  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
u65.5 -112 u19.5 -110 N/A u20.5 -120 N/A u20.5 +132 u19.5 -110 N/A N/A u68.5 -115  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+145 +120 N/A +124 N/A +134 N/A N/A N/A +195  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-175 -140 N/A -160 N/A -178 N/A N/A N/A -245  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -120 N/A +1.5 -146 +0.5 -120 N/A N/A +6 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 -110 N/A -1.5 +112 -0.5 -110 N/A N/A -6 -112  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
o65.5 -108 o14.5 +105 N/A o14.5 +130 N/A o9.5 -118 o13.5 -150 N/A N/A o68.5 -105  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
u65.5 -112 u14.5 -125 N/A u14.5 -166 N/A u9.5 -112 u13.5 +115 N/A N/A u68.5 -115  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+145 +130 N/A +145 N/A +126 N/A N/A N/A +195  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-175 -155 N/A -188 N/A -158 N/A N/A N/A -245  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -125 N/A -0.5 +105 N/A +1.5 -146 +0.5 -125 N/A N/A +6 -108  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-2.5 -110 -0.5 +105 N/A +0.5 -135 N/A -1.5 +110 -0.5 even N/A N/A -6 -112  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
o65.5 -108 o19.5 -110 N/A o18.5 -115 N/A o17.5 -104 o19.5 -120 N/A N/A o68.5 -105  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
u65.5 -112 u19.5 -110 N/A u18.5 -115 N/A u17.5 -120 u19.5 -105 N/A N/A u68.5 -115  
Final
Air Force Falcons 187 Air Force
+145 +120 N/A -130 N/A +118 N/A N/A N/A +195  
San Jose State Spartans 188 San Jose State
-175 -140 N/A even N/A -148 N/A N/A N/A -245  

Air Force's offense is shockingly effective for a service academy. They rank 3rd in EPA/pass play and 10th in EPA/rush. Overall they rank 9th in offensive success rate, so Air Force will be primed to pick apart this 105th rated defenses in San Jose State.

Air Force's defense is not good, but SJSU is not the team to take advantage of this. I like Air Force to come out on top in this Mountain West matchup.

Best Bet: Air Force Falcons +5.5 (-115) + ML (+170)

FLORIDA STATE VS. CLEMSON BEST BET

FSU @ CLEM Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+16.5 -110 +0.5 -120 +0.5 -115 +0.5 -122 +0.5 -120 +1.5 -124 +0.5 -120 +10.5 -120 +1.5 -122 +1.5 -108  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-16.5 -110 -0.5 even -0.5 -105 -0.5 +105 -0.5 even -1.5 +102 -0.5 -110 -10.5 -110 -1.5 -103 -1.5 -112  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
o55.5 -110 o27.5 -105 o27.5 -105 o27.5 -112 o27.5 -110 o29.5 -105 o27.5 -120 o33.5 even o27.5 -120 o57.5 -105  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
u55.5 -110 u27.5 -115 u27.5 -115 u27.5 -108 u27.5 -110 u29.5 -115 u27.5 -110 u33.5 -135 u27.5 -109 u57.5 -115  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+525 -105 -105 -108 -105 +102 N/A N/A -103 -102  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-750 -115 -115 -112 -115 -122 N/A N/A -127 -118  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+16.5 -110 +0.5 -135 +0.5 -135 +0.5 -145 +0.5 -135 +1.5 -158 +0.5 -140 +6.5 +180 +1.5 -152 +1.5 -108  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-16.5 -110 -0.5 +105 -0.5 even -0.5 +114 -0.5 +105 -1.5 +124 -0.5 +110 -6.5 -265 -1.5 +117 -1.5 -112  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
o55.5 -110 o12.5 -125 o13.5 -110 o13.5 -110 o12.5 -130 o13.5 -116 o13.5 -115 o14.5 -210 o13.5 even o57.5 -105  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
u55.5 -110 u12.5 -105 u13.5 -120 u13.5 -120 u12.5 even u13.5 -108 u13.5 -115 u14.5 +150 u13.5 -130 u57.5 -115  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+525 +105 +105 even even +102 N/A N/A +104 -102  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-750 -135 -140 -130 -130 -130 N/A N/A -134 -118  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+16.5 -110 N/A N/A +1.5 -135 +0.5 -125 N/A N/A N/A N/A +1.5 -108  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-16.5 -110 N/A N/A -1.5 +114 -0.5 +105 N/A N/A N/A N/A -1.5 -112  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
o55.5 -110 N/A N/A o28.5 -105 o24.5 even N/A o28.5 -105 N/A N/A o57.5 -105  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
u55.5 -110 N/A N/A u28.5 -115 u24.5 -120 N/A u28.5 -125 N/A N/A u57.5 -115  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+525 N/A N/A +102 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -102  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-750 N/A N/A -122 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -118  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+16.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -105 N/A +1.5 -160 +0.5 -140 N/A N/A +1.5 -108  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-16.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -125 N/A -1.5 +124 -0.5 +110 N/A N/A -1.5 -112  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
o55.5 -110 o14.5 -110 N/A o14.5 -110 N/A o16.5 -115 o14.5 -105 N/A N/A o57.5 -105  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
u55.5 -110 u14.5 -110 N/A u14.5 -120 N/A u16.5 -113 u14.5 -125 N/A N/A u57.5 -115  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+525 -110 N/A -145 N/A -113 N/A N/A N/A -102  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-750 -110 N/A +114 N/A -113 N/A N/A N/A -118  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+16.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -160 N/A +1.5 -186 -0.5 +130 N/A N/A +1.5 -108  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-16.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 +124 N/A -1.5 +140 +0.5 -170 N/A N/A -1.5 -112  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
o55.5 -110 o14 even N/A o13.5 -120 N/A o6.5 +114 o13.5 -115 N/A N/A o57.5 -105  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
u55.5 -110 u14 -120 N/A u13.5 -110 N/A u6.5 -148 u13.5 -115 N/A N/A u57.5 -115  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+525 -110 N/A even N/A -113 N/A N/A N/A -102  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-750 -110 N/A -130 N/A -113 N/A N/A N/A -118  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+16.5 -110 +0.5 -155 N/A +0.5 -125 N/A +1.5 -180 -0.5 +120 N/A N/A +1.5 -108  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-16.5 -110 -0.5 +130 N/A -0.5 -105 N/A -1.5 +134 +0.5 -160 N/A N/A -1.5 -112  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
o55.5 -110 o16.5 -110 N/A o14.5 -125 N/A o14.5 +108 o14.5 even N/A N/A o57.5 -105  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
u55.5 -110 u16.5 -110 N/A u14.5 -105 N/A u14.5 -135 u14.5 -130 N/A N/A u57.5 -115  
Final
Florida State Seminoles 137 Florida State
+525 -110 N/A +110 N/A -113 N/A N/A N/A -102  
Clemson Tigers 138 Clemson
-750 -110 N/A -140 N/A -113 N/A N/A N/A -118  

The Seminole's advantages in this matchup are plentiful. Their 15th ranked pass offense will face up against Clemson's 63rd rated pass defense, and FSU's offensive success rate ranks 19th in college football.

FSU also has the benefit of cruising to a win against Wake Forest last week while Clemson was involved in a close matchup against Duke that ended in heart-break. FSU is going to be well rested and poised to take care of their statistical advantages against the Tigers.

Best Bet: Florida State Seminoles +2.5 (-110)

NEVADA VS. UTAH STATE BEST BET

NEV @ USU Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+10.5 -110 +6 -105 +4.5 -105 +6.5 -108 +6.5 -115 +6.5 -112 +6.5 -105 +6.5 -105 +6.5 -104 +10 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-10.5 -110 -6 -115 -4.5 -115 -6.5 -112 -6.5 -107 -6.5 -112 -6.5 -125 -6.5 -115 -6.5 -120 -10 -108  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
o52.5 -112 o27 -110 o26.5 -118 o26.5 -120 o27 -104 o27.5 +108 o26.5 -125 o31.5 even o26.5 -130 o52.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
u52.5 -108 u27 -110 u26.5 -102 u26.5 even u27 -120 u27.5 -132 u26.5 -105 u31.5 -135 u26.5 even u52.5 -108  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+310 +230 +220 +235 +225 +225 N/A N/A +245 +310  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-395 -280 -275 -285 -295 -290 N/A N/A -345 -395  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+10.5 -110 +3.5 -125 +3.5 -125 +3.5 -120 N/A +2.5 -102 +2.5 +105 +12.5 -115 +3.5 -124 +10 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-10.5 -110 -3.5 -105 -3.5 -102 -3.5 -110 N/A -2.5 -124 -2.5 -130 -12.5 -115 -3.5 -106 -10 -108  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
o52.5 -112 o10.5 -115 o10.5 -110 o10.5 -110 N/A o10.5 -108 o10.5 -105 o17.5 +130 o10.5 -106 o52.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
u52.5 -108 u10.5 -115 u10.5 -110 u10.5 -120 N/A u10.5 -116 u10.5 -115 u17.5 -180 u10.5 -122 u52.5 -108  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+310 +180 +180 +185 N/A +186 N/A N/A +230 +310  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-395 -230 -235 -245 N/A -245 N/A N/A -315 -395  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A +4.5 -120 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +10 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A -4.5 even N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -10 -108  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
o52.5 -112 N/A N/A o25.5 -112 N/A N/A o25.5 -115 N/A N/A o52.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
u52.5 -108 N/A N/A u25.5 -108 N/A N/A u25.5 -115 N/A N/A u52.5 -108  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+310 N/A N/A +195 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +310  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-395 N/A N/A -238 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -395  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 even N/A +3.5 -125 +3.5 -135 N/A N/A +10 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -130 N/A -3.5 -106 -3.5 +105 N/A N/A -10 -108  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
o52.5 -112 o14 -120 N/A o14.5 -105 N/A o14.5 -102 o14.5 even N/A N/A o52.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
u52.5 -108 u14 even N/A u14.5 -125 N/A u14.5 -122 u14.5 -125 N/A N/A u52.5 -108  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+310 +190 N/A +160 N/A +186 N/A N/A N/A +310  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-395 -225 N/A -210 N/A -230 N/A N/A N/A -395  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+10.5 -110 N/A N/A +2.5 -105 N/A +2.5 -114 +2.5 -105 N/A N/A +10 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-10.5 -110 N/A N/A -2.5 -125 N/A -2.5 -112 -2.5 -125 N/A N/A -10 -108  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
o52.5 -112 o13 -110 N/A o10.5 -115 N/A o14.5 +210 o10.5 -105 N/A N/A o52.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
u52.5 -108 u13 -110 N/A u10.5 -115 N/A u14.5 -300 u10.5 -125 N/A N/A u52.5 -108  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+310 +160 N/A +175 N/A +164 N/A N/A N/A +310  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-395 -190 N/A -220 N/A -210 N/A N/A N/A -395  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+10.5 -110 +0.5 -115 N/A +1.5 -115 N/A +1.5 -122 +0.5 -115 N/A N/A +10 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-10.5 -110 -0.5 -105 N/A -1.5 -115 N/A -1.5 -108 -0.5 -110 N/A N/A -10 -108  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
o52.5 -112 o13.5 -115 N/A o13.5 -135 N/A o13.5 -128 o13.5 -145 N/A N/A o52.5 -112  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
u52.5 -108 u13.5 -105 N/A u13.5 +105 N/A u13.5 +102 u13.5 +115 N/A N/A u52.5 -108  
Final
Nevada Wolf Pack 197 Nevada
+310 +145 N/A +145 N/A +146 N/A N/A N/A +310  
Utah State Aggies 198 Utah State
-395 -165 N/A -188 N/A -184 N/A N/A N/A -395  

Nevada's offense really struggles to move the ball. So far this season, the Wolfpack are 6-2 to the under highlighting their offensive deficiencies and strong pass defense. Nevada also plays extremely slow, averaging 63.6 offensive snaps per game.

Nevada ranks 135th in offense EPA/drive and 128th in offensive success rate. Nevada is the reason why this game will be low-scoring.

Best Bet: Nevada Wolf Pack @ Utah State Aggies u53.5 (-110)

SAN DIEGO STATE VS. HAWAI'I BEST BET

SDSU @ HAW Odds

  • Full Game
  • 1H
  • 1Q
  • 2Q
  • 3Q
  • 4Q
  • Spread
  • Total
  • Moneyline
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-2.5 -110 -3.5 -110 -3.5 -110 -3.5 -108 -3.5 -110 -3.5 -114 -4.5 -105 -5.5 -115 -5.5 -106 -6.5 -115  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+2.5 -110 +3.5 -110 +3.5 -110 +3.5 -112 +3.5 -110 +3.5 -106 +4.5 -125 +5.5 -115 +5.5 -118 +6.5 -105  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
o51.5 -102 o24 -110 o24.5 even o23.5 -122 o24 -110 o24.5 +110 o23.5 -115 o23.5 -110 o24.5 +102 o48.5 -105  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
u51.5 -118 u24 -110 u24.5 -120 u23.5 +102 u24 -110 u24.5 -134 u23.5 -115 u23.5 -120 u24.5 -136 u48.5 -115  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-192 -200 -200 -205 -205 -205 N/A N/A -225 -258  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+160 +170 +165 +164 +170 +164 N/A N/A +170 +210  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-2.5 -110 -0.5 -120 -2.5 -115 -1.5 -115 -0.5 -125 -1.5 -100 -1.5 -110 -0.5 -110 -2.5 -114 -6.5 -115  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -110 +2.5 -110 +1.5 -115 +0.5 -105 +1.5 -124 +1.5 -110 +0.5 -120 +2.5 -114 +6.5 -105  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
o51.5 -102 o10.5 -105 o10.5 -102 o9.5 -135 o10.5 +110 o10.5 +114 o10.5 +105 o10.5 +150 o9.5 -148 o48.5 -105  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
u51.5 -118 u10.5 -125 u10.5 -125 u9.5 +105 u10.5 -140 u10.5 -145 u10.5 -130 u10.5 -210 u9.5 +114 u48.5 -115  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-192 -170 -185 -188 -160 -180 N/A N/A -200 -258  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+160 +140 +140 +145 +130 +140 N/A N/A +150 +210  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -3.5 even -2.5 -120 N/A N/A N/A N/A -6.5 -115  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +3.5 -120 +2.5 even N/A N/A N/A N/A +6.5 -105  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
o51.5 -102 N/A N/A o23.5 -112 o23.5 -105 N/A o23.5 -110 N/A N/A o48.5 -105  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
u51.5 -118 N/A N/A u23.5 -108 u23.5 -115 N/A u23.5 -115 N/A N/A u48.5 -115  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-192 N/A N/A -185 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -258  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+160 N/A N/A +160 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A +210  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 even N/A -2.5 -128 -1.5 -110 N/A N/A -6.5 -115  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -130 N/A +2.5 -104 +1.5 -115 N/A N/A +6.5 -105  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
o51.5 -102 o13.5 -110 N/A o13.5 -120 N/A o16.5 -102 o13.5 -115 N/A N/A o48.5 -105  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
u51.5 -118 u13.5 -110 N/A u13.5 -110 N/A u16.5 -128 u13.5 -110 N/A N/A u48.5 -115  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-192 -160 N/A -140 N/A -188 N/A N/A N/A -258  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+160 +135 N/A +110 N/A +154 N/A N/A N/A +210  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-2.5 -110 N/A N/A -0.5 -115 N/A -1.5 -100 -0.5 -105 N/A N/A -6.5 -115  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+2.5 -110 N/A N/A +0.5 -115 N/A +1.5 -136 +0.5 -120 N/A N/A +6.5 -105  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
o51.5 -102 o10.5 -105 N/A o9.5 -140 N/A o10.5 +108 o9.5 -130 N/A N/A o48.5 -105  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
u51.5 -118 u10.5 -115 N/A u9.5 +110 N/A u10.5 -140 u9.5 even N/A N/A u48.5 -115  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-192 -200 N/A -175 N/A -170 N/A N/A N/A -258  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+160 +165 N/A +140 N/A +132 N/A N/A N/A +210  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-2.5 -110 -0.5 -105 N/A -1.5 -115 N/A -1.5 -100 -0.5 +105 N/A N/A -6.5 -115  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+2.5 -110 +0.5 -115 N/A +1.5 -115 N/A +1.5 -132 +0.5 -130 N/A N/A +6.5 -105  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
o51.5 -102 o13 -110 N/A o13.5 -105 N/A o12.5 -114 o13.5 -110 N/A N/A o48.5 -105  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
u51.5 -118 u13 -110 N/A u13.5 -125 N/A u12.5 -110 u13.5 -115 N/A N/A u48.5 -115  
Final
San Diego State Aztecs 203 San Diego State
-192 -170 N/A -180 N/A -170 N/A N/A N/A -258  
Hawai'i Rainbow Warriors 204 Hawai'i
+160 +145 N/A +140 N/A +132 N/A N/A N/A +210  

Drink your coffee because we are going to be staying up late for this matchup on the island!

San Diego State's defense is first class. They are the top pass defense in terms of EPA/pass, they are 3rd in defensive success rate, and 4th on early downs EPA/play allowed. Hawai'i just simply can not match up against this SDSU defense, so I expect the Aztecs to win big in this late night Mountain West matchup.

Best Bet: San Diego State Aztecs -7 (-105)

I would love to hear from you all. You can interact with me on Threads and best of luck this week!

Featured News

Dylan Wilkerson

Dylan Wilkerson

Dylan Wilkerson has over 5 years of experience reporting and analyzing the sports betting industry for various sites. His portfolio includes work for SportsHandle and Action Network, in addition to VegasInsider. His favorite sports are the NFL, College Football, The PGA Tour, the LIV Tour, and Cricket. Dylan has a broad and deep understanding of various sports-related topics. More from Dylan Wilkerson
•